The subject of the order is the supply of ICT devices for the Technical School Complex gen. prof. Sylwester Kaliski in Turku for equipping subject laboratories as part of the project "Modern technologies in vocational education as an element of the economic development of the functional area of the Turkish and Kola poviats", Wielkopolska Regional Operational Program for 2014-2020, Priority Axis 9 "Infrastructure for human capital", Action 9.3 "Investing in the development of education and training infrastructure", Sub-measure 9.3.2 "Investing in the development of vocational education infrastructure".

The subject of the order is the delivery of telephone exchanges (examination sets) for the equipment of the workshop of the Technical School Complex in Turku. Telephone exchanges - 10 pcs. Each equipped with an analog telephone set with CLIP in the FSK system, 2 pcs. A system telephone set compatible with the telephone exchange set 1, VoIP telephone set - SIP protocol, the configuration of the device from a web browser, support for VoIP accounts. 1. A detailed description of the subject of the contract is attached as Annex 1 to the ToR. The description contains minimum requirements. The contractor who refers to equivalent solutions described by the contracting authority is required to demonstrate that the supplies he offers meet the requirements specified by the contracting authority (Article 30 (5) of the Public Procurement Law). In all the provisions of the ToR and in its annexes, in which the contracting authority refers to standards, European technical assessments, approvals, technical specifications and technical reference systems in accordance with art. 30 paragraph 4 of the PPL Act, the Employer allows solutions equivalent to those described. If the names of specific manufacturers are given in the description of the subject of the order, they should be treated only as a description of the desired standard and quality. In all such situations, the Contractor may offer equivalent solutions with at least the same parameters. By equivalence is meant to offer a solution whose technical parameters are at least the same as those described in the ToR. If an equivalent solution is offered, the Contractor is required to demonstrate the equivalence of the solutions used.

The Awarding Entity considers the offers containing solutions with a different specification than those specified in the SIWZ and with parameters lower (worse) than those specified in this specification to be contrary to the ToR, and thus such offers will be rejected.

The bid evaluation criteria for lots 1 and 2 are as follows: a) price of the offer - 60% (gross), b) warranty and warranty - 20% (the warranty period corresponds to the period of the guarantee provided by the Contractor, however, is not less than the period resulting from the provisions Of the Civil Code and begins to run from the day of final acceptance without any reservations by the Employer), c) the term of the contract - 20% (number of days from the date of the contract).

The subject of the order is the supply of ICT equipment for the equipment of the workshop of the Technical School Complex in Turku. Wireless network analyzer - 6 pcs. Network cable tester - 6 pcs. Portable cable tester - 6 pcs. Set for one-mode and multi-mode measurements - 2 pcs. Optical power meter - 2 pcs. Digital oscilloscope - 6 pcs. Digital multimeter - 6 pcs. Spectrum analyzer - 6 pcs. Network accessories - 1 pcs. A detailed description of the subject of the order is attached as Annex 2 to the ToR. The description contains minimum requirements. The contractor who refers to equivalent solutions described by the contracting authority is required to demonstrate that the supplies he offers meet the requirements specified by the contracting authority (Article 30 (5) of the Public Procurement Law). In all the provisions of the ToR and in its annexes, in which the contracting authority refers to standards, European technical assessments, approvals, technical specifications and technical reference systems in accordance with art. 30 paragraph 4 of the Public Procurement Law, the Employer allows solutions equivalent to those described. If the names of specific manufacturers are given in the description of the subject of the order, they should be treated only as a description of the desired standard and quality. In all such situations, the Contractor may offer equivalent solutions with at least the same parameters. By equivalence is meant to offer a solution whose technical parameters are at least the same as those described in the ToR. If an equivalent solution is offered, the Contractor is required to demonstrate the equivalence of the solutions used. The Awarding Entity considers the offers containing solutions with a different specification than those specified in the SIWZ and with parameters lower (worse) than those specified in this specification to be contrary to the ToR, and thus such offers will be rejected. The bid evaluation criteria for lots 1 and 2 are as follows: a) price of the offer - 60% (gross), b) warranty and warranty - 20% (the warranty period corresponds to the period of the guarantee provided by the Contractor, however, is not less than the period resulting from the provisions Of the Civil Code and begins to run from the day of final acceptance without any reservations by the Employer), c) the term of the contract - 20% (number of days from the date of the contract).