The competition concerns the HVAC design for the renovation and extension of Tapiola Swimming Hall, a cultural historical significance, with its other tasks, as further defined in the call for tender.
The Tapiola Swimming Hall was completed in 1965 and its architectural design has been handled by Aarne Ervi. The swimming hall has undergone a renovation and extension in 2005. The design and execution takes into account the cityscape, building artistic and architectural values of the Tapiola Swimming Hall, which will be preserved in connection with the repair and expansion in accordance with the conservation regulations of the Museum Agency and the ELY Centre.
Tapiola Swimming Hall is located in Tapiola, Espoo, RKY-area. The swimming pool is protected as a building of construction artistically value under section 57 (2) of MRL under the formula notation sr-1.
All swimming pool facilities as well as outdoor areas will be repaired in conjunction with this project. The renovation, expansion and restoration of the swimming pool is a complex design and construction work that requires close cooperation with various authorities.
Scope of construction project: 3,767 hym
Annual visitor count: about 300,000 customers.
Target price for the construction project: approximately 29.9 million. EUR (0% VAT).
Target schedule: planning will begin no later than August 2021. The building will be completed in spring 2025.
Implementation format: collaborative project management bladder.
The acquisition and related requirements are described in more detail in the Annexes to the call for tender.
HVAC design of the Tapiola Swimming Pool, description of the invitation to tender:
The tender is 1 step.
1) Terms of eligibility
The tenderer shall present the office references in Annex 14a. Office references are minimum requirements and are not scored.
The eligibility conditions for the TATE Chief Designer, the HVIA Designer, the RAU Designer and their deputies, such as details of the qualification, qualification and language certificate requirements, are set out in Annex 13 the eligibility criteria and criteria for the Professional Qualification.
2) Quality points
The bidder presents key figures in the planning team:
— Tate Chief Designer (TATE)
— HVAC Designer responsible for HVAC design, HVAC designer in the call for tender (Plumbing)
— Designer responsible for RAU design, building automation designer (RAU)
— Substitutes for the aforementioned designers.
The references of all the above designers should be presented in Annex 14b. Quality points are calculated from the references of Tate Chief Designer, HVIA Designer and RAU Designer. See Quality Points Calculation Formula: Annex 12 Scoring Table. Substitute references do not become quality points.
3) Price offer
Offices issue a price offer in Annex 05.
HVAC design is broken down to the price offer by design position.
See price point calculation formula: Appendix 12 Scoring table.
4) Assessment
On the basis of references, the subscriber first calculates quality scores for all providers. The subscriber then opens bidders' price quotes and calculates the price points and total points (see Annex 12 TUH, Scoring Table).
The bidder with the highest points in the quality section receives 75 reference points for the final bid comparison, to which the points received by the other bidders are proportioned. The bid score for the final comparison = the quality points received by the bid concerned divided by the quality points of the bid with the highest quality points and multiplied by 75 points.
The offer of the cheapest price will receive 20 reference points for the final comparison. The reference points for other bids are calculated as follows: the reference point of the bid = the price of the cheapest bid divided by the price of the bid concerned and multiplied by 20 points.
The offer of the cheapest average price will receive five (5) reference points for the final comparison. The reference points for other bids are calculated as follows: the reference point of the offer = the cheapest average average price divided by the relevant average average average price and multiplied by five (5) points. The average hour price is calculated by dividing the total of the bid by the aggregate number of hours of the design positions.
The HVIA Planning Office/Work Consortium, which has received the best co-points (aggregate quality and price points) of the bidders, is selected to manage the HVIA design of the project.
5) The subscriber separately competes the following design areas
— Energy and Lifecycle Planning
— Water Treatment Planning
— Chief and Architectural Designer
— Geo- and grounding design
— Structural design
— Acoustic design
— Fire engineering
— Data model coordination
— Moisture and purity coordinator
— Service book coordinator
— Security Coordinator.
The design of the project will be carried out by data modelling in respect of all design disciplines, thus requiring the planning parties to have knowledge model skills at the level required in the data model guidance.