The local transit area (OD) Oranienbaum is loaded with around 8,000 vehicles every day. The existing routing parameters are no longer compliant with today's regulations. A compact residential development on a section of the OD means that noise and pollution, vibrations from heavy traffic (including the associated deterioration in the fabric of streets and buildings), the risk of accidents (human protection) and a decrease in the quality of living and living are specified. It is therefore necessary to build a new bypass (OU). This is intended to reduce through traffic, reduce environmental and environmental pollution as well as increase accessibility and connection quality.

- Project planning traffic facilities Lph 1 and 2, optional Lph 3-4 according to § 47 HOAI i. V. m. Appendix 13, Section 13.1;

- Special / additional services in phases 1 and 2:

—— Accompaniment of the regional planning procedure including preparation of the necessary documents and participation in meetings;

- documents for determining the line;

—— Federal-state coordination process (project coordination 1 - variant search, project coordination 2 - pre-selection of preferred variant);

- Determination of special actions not specified in the standards;

—— selection and inspection of similar objects;

—— Preparation of line inventory plans;

—— sustainability studies;

- preparation of cost-benefit studies;

—— Evidence of traffic quality of the preferred option;

—— Proof of road safety of the preferred variant;

- performance audit;

- Evidence of the imperative reasons of overriding public interest in the necessity of the measure;

—— Obtaining extracts from the land register, cadastre and other official documents;

- Participation in administrative agreements;

—— Optional: variant analysis (from 4th variant);

- Special / additional services in phase 3 and 4 (optional):

—— optional: federal-state coordination process (project coordination 3 - rough draft, project coordination 4 - visual notice);

—— optional: technical and economic evidence to justify the project and thus the reduction of the chosen technical solution; in particular, evidence of traffic quality, traffic safety, economic viability and the determination of the total financial expenses must be provided;

—— optional: sustainability study;

—— optional: proof of the compelling reasons for the predominantly public interest of the measure;

—— optional: participation in administrative agreements;

—— optional: fictitious cost calculations (cost sharing);

—— optional: objection management.