1. The subject of the contract is the supply and purchase of medical equipment for the needs of the Franciszek Raszeja Municipal Hospital in Poznań.

2. A detailed description of the subject of the contract containing information about the assortment, quantities and its technical and functional parameters is specified in Annex 2 to the SWZ, which is its integral part.

3. The contracting authority shall allow for the submission of partial tenders. The order was divided into 6 parts/packages, i.e.:

Package No. 1 Anesthetic apparatus;

Package No. 2 Respirator;

Package No. 3 Ultrasound machine;

Package No. 4 Neonatal incubator; Package No. 5 Operating and treatment table with operating lamp;

Package No. 6 Expansion of Monaco's centralized perinatal monitoring and surveillance system with an additional monitoring station along with the purchase of Toco and Cardio heads as equipment for CTG Corometrics.

1. Package No. 1 Anesthetic apparatus.

2. A detailed description of the subject of the contract containing information about the assortment, quantities and its technical and functional parameters is specified in Annex 2 to the SWZ, which is its integral part.

3. If in any document constituting an element of the description of the subject of the contract there are indications of trademarks, patents or origin, source or a specific process that characterizes products or services provided by a specific Contractor (if this could lead to the preference or elimination of some Contractors or its products), it should be understood, in accordance with the provision of Article 99(5) of the PPL, that the Ordering Party cannot describe the subject of the contract in a sufficiently precise and understandable manner. In such circumstances, the Contracting Authority allows for the possibility of submitting equivalent solutions in the tender, indicating that the minimum requirements to be met by equivalent solutions are requirements not worse than the parameters indicated in these documents, and their criteria for assessing equivalence are indicated in the description of the subject of the contract.

If the Ordering Party in the description of the subject of the contract indicated trademarks, patents, origin or sources as well as standards, technical approvals and reference systems, it is allowed to offer solutions equivalent to those described, provided that they maintain the same minimum technical, quality and functional parameters, etc. The Contractor who refers to equivalent solutions described by the Contracting Authority is obliged to indicate that the subject of the contract offered by it meets the requirements specified by the Contracting Entity. If the Ordering Party describes the subject of the contract by indicating trademarks, patents or origin, source or a specific process that characterizes products or services provided by a specific Contractor, the Contracting Authority shall allow equivalent solutions.

If the Contracting Authority describes the subject of the contract by reference to standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and technical reference systems referred to in Article 101 paragraph 1 point 2 and paragraph 3 of the Act, the Contracting Authority shall allow solutions equivalent to those described.

4. Deadline for the contract: within 3 months from the date of signing the contract, but not later than by 15 December 2023.

5. Pursuant to Article 257 of the PPL, the Contracting Authority may cancel this procurement procedure if the public funds that the Contracting Authority intended to allocate to finance all or part of the contract have not been granted to it, and the possibility of cancelling the procedure on this basis has been provided for in the contract notice - in the procedure conducted under the open tender procedure.

1. Package No. 2 Respirator.

2. A detailed description of the subject of the contract containing information about the assortment, quantities and its technical and functional parameters is specified in Annex 2 to the SWZ, which is its integral part.

3. If in any document constituting an element of the description of the subject of the contract there are indications of trademarks, patents or origin, source or a specific process that characterizes products or services provided by a specific Contractor (if this could lead to the preference or elimination of some Contractors or its products), it should be understood, in accordance with the provision of Article 99(5) of the PPL, that the Ordering Party cannot describe the subject of the contract in a sufficiently precise and understandable manner. In such circumstances, the Contracting Authority allows for the possibility of submitting equivalent solutions in the tender, indicating that the minimum requirements to be met by equivalent solutions are requirements not worse than the parameters indicated in these documents, and their criteria for assessing equivalence are indicated in the description of the subject of the contract.

If the Ordering Party in the description of the subject of the contract indicated trademarks, patents, origin or sources as well as standards, technical approvals and reference systems, it is allowed to offer solutions equivalent to those described, provided that they maintain the same minimum technical, quality and functional parameters, etc. The Contractor who refers to equivalent solutions described by the Contracting Authority is obliged to indicate that the subject of the contract offered by it meets the requirements specified by the Contracting Entity. If the Ordering Party describes the subject of the contract by indicating trademarks, patents or origin, source or a specific process that characterizes products or services provided by a specific Contractor, the Contracting Authority shall allow equivalent solutions.

If the Contracting Authority describes the subject of the contract by reference to standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and technical reference systems referred to in Article 101 paragraph 1 point 2 and paragraph 3 of the Act, the Contracting Authority shall allow solutions equivalent to those described.

4. Deadline for the contract: within 3 months from the date of signing the contract, but not later than by 15 December 2023.

5. Pursuant to Article 257 of the PPL, the Contracting Authority may cancel this procurement procedure if the public funds that the Contracting Authority intended to allocate to finance all or part of the contract have not been granted to it, and the possibility of cancelling the procedure on this basis has been provided for in the contract notice - in the procedure conducted under the open tender procedure.

1. Package No. 3 Ultrasound machine.

2. A detailed description of the subject of the contract containing information about the assortment, quantities and its technical and functional parameters is specified in Annex 2 to the SWZ, which is its integral part.

3. If in any document constituting an element of the description of the subject of the contract there are indications of trademarks, patents or origin, source or a specific process that characterizes products or services provided by a specific Contractor (if this could lead to the preference or elimination of some Contractors or its products), it should be understood, in accordance with the provision of Article 99(5) of the PPL, that the Ordering Party cannot describe the subject of the contract in a sufficiently precise and understandable manner. In such circumstances, the Contracting Authority allows for the possibility of submitting equivalent solutions in the tender, indicating that the minimum requirements to be met by equivalent solutions are requirements not worse than the parameters indicated in these documents, and their criteria for assessing equivalence are indicated in the description of the subject of the contract.

If the Ordering Party in the description of the subject of the contract indicated trademarks, patents, origin or sources as well as standards, technical approvals and reference systems, it is allowed to offer solutions equivalent to those described, provided that they maintain the same minimum technical, quality and functional parameters, etc. The Contractor who refers to equivalent solutions described by the Contracting Authority is obliged to indicate that the subject of the contract offered by it meets the requirements specified by the Contracting Entity. If the Ordering Party describes the subject of the contract by indicating trademarks, patents or origin, source or a specific process that characterizes products or services provided by a specific Contractor, the Contracting Authority shall allow equivalent solutions.

If the Contracting Authority describes the subject of the contract by reference to standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and technical reference systems referred to in Article 101 paragraph 1 point 2 and paragraph 3 of the Act, the Contracting Authority shall allow solutions equivalent to those described.

4. Deadline for the contract: within 3 months from the date of signing the contract, but not later than by 15 December 2023.

5. Pursuant to Article 257 of the PPL, the Contracting Authority may cancel this procurement procedure if the public funds that the Contracting Authority intended to allocate to finance all or part of the contract have not been granted to it, and the possibility of cancelling the procedure on this basis has been provided for in the contract notice - in the procedure conducted under the open tender procedure.

1. Package No. 4 Neonatal incubator.

2. A detailed description of the subject of the contract containing information about the assortment, quantities and its technical and functional parameters is specified in Annex 2 to the SWZ, which is its integral part.

3. If in any document constituting an element of the description of the subject of the contract there are indications of trademarks, patents or origin, source or a specific process that characterizes products or services provided by a specific Contractor (if this could lead to the preference or elimination of some Contractors or its products), it should be understood, in accordance with the provision of Article 99(5) of the PPL, that the Ordering Party cannot describe the subject of the contract in a sufficiently precise and understandable manner. In such circumstances, the Contracting Authority allows for the possibility of submitting equivalent solutions in the tender, indicating that the minimum requirements to be met by equivalent solutions are requirements not worse than the parameters indicated in these documents, and their criteria for assessing equivalence are indicated in the description of the subject of the contract.

If the Ordering Party in the description of the subject of the contract indicated trademarks, patents, origin or sources as well as standards, technical approvals and reference systems, it is allowed to offer solutions equivalent to those described, provided that they maintain the same minimum technical, quality and functional parameters, etc. The Contractor who refers to equivalent solutions described by the Contracting Authority is obliged to indicate that the subject of the contract offered by it meets the requirements specified by the Contracting Entity. If the Ordering Party describes the subject of the contract by indicating trademarks, patents or origin, source or a specific process that characterizes products or services provided by a specific Contractor, the Contracting Authority shall allow equivalent solutions.

If the Contracting Authority describes the subject of the contract by reference to standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and technical reference systems referred to in Article 101 paragraph 1 point 2 and paragraph 3 of the Act, the Contracting Authority shall allow solutions equivalent to those described.

4. Deadline for the contract: within 3 months from the date of signing the contract, but not later than by 15 December 2023.

5. Pursuant to Article 257 of the PPL, the Contracting Authority may cancel this procurement procedure if the public funds that the Contracting Authority intended to allocate to finance all or part of the contract have not been granted to it, and the possibility of cancelling the procedure on this basis has been provided for in the contract notice - in the procedure conducted under the open tender procedure.

1. Package No. 5 Operating table with operating lamp

2. A detailed description of the subject of the contract containing information about the assortment, quantities and its technical and functional parameters is specified in Annex 2 to the SWZ, which is its integral part.

3. If in any document constituting an element of the description of the subject of the contract there are indications of trademarks, patents or origin, source or a specific process that characterizes products or services provided by a specific Contractor (if this could lead to the preference or elimination of some Contractors or its products), it should be understood, in accordance with the provision of Article 99(5) of the PPL, that the Ordering Party cannot describe the subject of the contract in a sufficiently precise and understandable manner. In such circumstances, the Contracting Authority allows for the possibility of submitting equivalent solutions in the tender, indicating that the minimum requirements to be met by equivalent solutions are requirements not worse than the parameters indicated in these documents, and their criteria for assessing equivalence are indicated in the description of the subject of the contract.

If the Ordering Party in the description of the subject of the contract indicated trademarks, patents, origin or sources as well as standards, technical approvals and reference systems, it is allowed to offer solutions equivalent to those described, provided that they maintain the same minimum technical, quality and functional parameters, etc. The Contractor who refers to equivalent solutions described by the Contracting Authority is obliged to indicate that the subject of the contract offered by it meets the requirements specified by the Contracting Entity. If the Ordering Party describes the subject of the contract by indicating trademarks, patents or origin, source or a specific process that characterizes products or services provided by a specific Contractor, the Contracting Authority shall allow equivalent solutions.

If the Contracting Authority describes the subject of the contract by reference to standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and technical reference systems referred to in Article 101 paragraph 1 point 2 and paragraph 3 of the Act, the Contracting Authority shall allow solutions equivalent to those described.

4. Deadline for the contract: within 3 months from the date of signing the contract, but not later than by 15 December 2023. For package no. 5, the delivery date will be scored as a criterion for evaluating offers.

5. Pursuant to Article 257 of the PPL, the Contracting Authority may cancel this procurement procedure if the public funds that the Contracting Authority intended to allocate to finance all or part of the contract have not been granted to it, and the possibility of cancelling the procedure on this basis has been provided for in the contract notice - in the procedure conducted under the open tender procedure.

1. Package No. 6 Expansion of Monaco's centralized perinatal monitoring and surveillance system with an additional monitoring station along with the purchase of Toco and Cardio heads as equipment for CTG Corometrics.

2. A detailed description of the subject of the contract containing information about the assortment, quantities and its technical and functional parameters is specified in Annex 2 to the SWZ, which is its integral part.

3. If in any document constituting an element of the description of the subject of the contract there are indications of trademarks, patents or origin, source or a specific process that characterizes products or services provided by a specific Contractor (if this could lead to the preference or elimination of some Contractors or its products), it should be understood, in accordance with the provision of Article 99(5) of the PPL, that the Ordering Party cannot describe the subject of the contract in a sufficiently precise and understandable manner. In such circumstances, the Contracting Authority allows for the possibility of submitting equivalent solutions in the tender, indicating that the minimum requirements to be met by equivalent solutions are requirements not worse than the parameters indicated in these documents, and their criteria for assessing equivalence are indicated in the description of the subject of the contract.

If the Ordering Party in the description of the subject of the contract indicated trademarks, patents, origin or sources as well as standards, technical approvals and reference systems, it is allowed to offer solutions equivalent to those described, provided that they maintain the same minimum technical, quality and functional parameters, etc. The Contractor who refers to equivalent solutions described by the Contracting Authority is obliged to indicate that the subject of the contract offered by it meets the requirements specified by the Contracting Entity. If the Ordering Party describes the subject of the contract by indicating trademarks, patents or origin, source or a specific process that characterizes products or services provided by a specific Contractor, the Contracting Authority shall allow equivalent solutions.

If the Contracting Authority describes the subject of the contract by reference to standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and technical reference systems referred to in Article 101 paragraph 1 point 2 and paragraph 3 of the Act, the Contracting Authority shall allow solutions equivalent to those described.

4. Deadline for the contract: within 3 months from the date of signing the contract, but not later than by 15 December 2023.

5. Pursuant to Article 257 of the PPL, the Contracting Authority may cancel this procurement procedure if the public funds that the Contracting Authority intended to allocate to finance all or part of the contract have not been granted to it, and the possibility of cancelling the procedure on this basis has been provided for in the contract notice - in the procedure conducted under the open tender procedure.