1. The subject of this contract is successive deliveries of medical devices for the Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Institute of Oncology – National Research Institute Branch in Gliwice.

2. The description of the object of the contract and the conditions for the execution of the order are contained in

1) Assortment and price specification – Annex 2.1-2.15 to the SWZ,

2) Draft provisions of the agreement that will be introduced into the content of the contract – Annex 4 to the SWZ.

1. The subject of this contract is successive deliveries of medical devices for the Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Institute of Oncology – National Research Institute Branch in Gliwice, hereinafter referred to as the Ordering Party.

2.The description of the object of the contract and the conditions for the execution of the order are contained in

1) Assortment and Price Specification — Annex No 2.1 to SWZ,

2) The designed provisions of the contract to be entered into the contents of the contract — Annex 4 to the SWZ.

Information clause arising from Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of individuals in connection with the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC The Ordering Authority posted in SWZ.

The Contracting Authority does not provide for the conclusion of a framework agreement, the establishment of a dynamic purchasing system, electronic auctions and supplementary orders.

The proceedings do not cover the objections set out in Article 94 of the Pzp Act.

Information on the Contractors' joint application for the award of the contract is contained in Chapter IX of the SWZ.

Description of equivalence.

1) If the description of the subject of the contract has been described by indicating trademarks, patents or origin, source or a specific process that characterizes products or services provided by a specific contractor, the Contracting Authority shall allow solutions equivalent to those described, and such indication shall be accompanied by the words "or equivalent".

The phrase 'equivalent' means that the Contracting Party authorises products or services that meet the minimum quality, operational and technical requirements corresponding to the requirements specified by the Ordering Party in the description of the subject matter of the contract. This means that the equivalent product must have parameters not worse than those indicated by the Ordering Party, i.e. at least at a level such as required by the Ordering Party. The use of equivalent products shall not degrade the quality of the results achieved or adversely affect the proper use or functioning of the product or service for their intended purpose.

If the Contractor proposes qualitatively equivalent products or services to the products indicated by the Contractor, the Contractor shall demonstrate

in an offer that the products or services offered by him meet the requirements laid down by the Contracting Authority, by submitting the means of evidence in question referred to in Articles 104-107 of the Pzp Act, proving that the proposed solutions meet the requirements set out in the equivalent extent description of the object of the order.

2) If the description of the subject of the contract refers to standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and technical reference systems referred to in Article 101(1)(2) and (3) of the Public Procurement Law, the Contracting Authority shall allow solutions equivalent to those described, and such reference shall be accompanied by the words "or equivalent". The contractor who offers solutions equivalent to the indicated standards is obliged to demonstrate in the tender that the equivalent solution offered by him meets the requirements specified by the Contracting Authority, by indicating in the offer form a standard equivalent to the offered product and attaching to the offer the evidence referred to in Articles 104 - 107 of the PPL, proving that the proposed solutions to the standards meet the requirements specified in the description to an equivalent degree the subject of the contract.

3) If the Contractor does not submit the evidence in question or the evidence submitted is incomplete (thus not confirming the equivalence of the offer to the extent described in the description of the subject of the contract), the Contracting Authority will not call for their submission / supplementation. All costs and activities related to the confirmation of compliance with the equivalent quality parameters by the offer shall be borne by the Contractor.

1. The subject of this contract is successive deliveries of medical devices for the Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Institute of Oncology – National Research Institute Branch in Gliwice, hereinafter referred to as the Ordering Party.

2. The description of the object of the contract and the conditions for the execution of the order are contained in

1) Assortment and price specification – Annex 2.10 to the SWZ,

2) Draft provisions of the agreement that will be introduced into the content of the contract – Annex 4 to the SWZ.

Information clause arising from Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of individuals in connection with the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC The Ordering Authority posted in SWZ.

The Contracting Authority does not provide for the conclusion of a framework agreement, the establishment of a dynamic purchasing system, electronic auctions and supplementary orders.

The proceedings do not cover the objections set out in Article 94 of the Pzp Act.

Information on the Contractors' joint application for the award of the contract is contained in Chapter IX of the SWZ.

Description of equivalence.

1) Where the description of the subject of the contract is described by the indication of trademarks, patents or origin, source or specific process which characterizes the products or services provided by a specific Contractor shall allow solutions equivalent to the described, and such indication is accompanied by the words 'or equivalent'.

The phrase 'equivalent' means that the Contracting Party authorises products or services that meet the minimum quality, operational and technical requirements corresponding to the requirements specified by the Ordering Party in the description of the subject matter of the contract. This means that the equivalent product must have parameters not worse than those indicated by the Ordering Party, i.e. at least at a level such as required by the Ordering Party. The use of equivalent products shall not degrade the quality of the results achieved or adversely affect the proper use or functioning of the product or service for their intended purpose.

If the Contractor proposes qualitatively equivalent products or services to the products indicated by the Contractor, the Contractor shall demonstrate

in an offer that the products or services offered by him meet the requirements laid down by the Contracting Authority, by submitting the means of evidence in question referred to in Articles 104-107 of the Pzp Act, proving that the proposed solutions meet the requirements set out in the equivalent extent description of the object of the order.

2) Where the description of the subject of the contract refers to standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and technical reference systems referred to in Article 101 (1) (2) and paragraph 3 of the Law of the PZP Contracting Authority shall allow solutions equivalent to those described and accompanied by such reference the words “or equivalent”. The Contractor which offers solutions equivalent to the specified standards shall be obliged to demonstrate in the offer that the equivalent solution offered by him meets the requirements set by the Contracting Authority, by indicating in the tender form an equivalent standard to the product offered and attaching to the the offers of the means of evidence referred to in Articles 104 - 107 of the Pzp Act, proving that the proposed solutions to standards meet the requirements set out in the description of the subject matter of the contract.

3) If the Contractor fails to submit the means of evidence in question or the evidence submitted is incomplete (thus not confirming the equivalence of the offer to the extent described in the description of the subject matter of the contract), the Contracting Party shall not call for their submission of /supplementation. All costs and activities related to confirming the fulfillment of the offer equivalent to the quality parameters shall rest with the Contractor.

1. The subject of this contract is successive deliveries of medical devices for the Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Institute of Oncology – National Research Institute Branch in Gliwice, hereinafter referred to as the Ordering Party.

2. The description of the object of the contract and the conditions for the execution of the order are contained in

1) Assortment and price specification – Annex 2.11 to SWZ,

2) Draft provisions of the agreement that will be introduced into the content of the contract – Annex 4 to the SWZ.

Information clause arising from Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of individuals in connection with the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC The Ordering Authority posted in SWZ.

The Contracting Authority does not provide for the conclusion of a framework agreement, the establishment of a dynamic purchasing system, electronic auctions and supplementary orders.

The proceedings do not cover the objections set out in Article 94 of the Pzp Act.

Information on the Contractors' joint application for the award of the contract is contained in Chapter IX of the SWZ.

Description of equivalence.

1) Where the description of the subject of the contract is described by the indication of trademarks, patents or origin, source or specific process which characterizes the products or services provided by a specific Contractor shall allow solutions equivalent to the described, and such indication is accompanied by the words 'or equivalent'.

The phrase 'equivalent' means that the Contracting Party authorises products or services that meet the minimum quality, operational and technical requirements corresponding to the requirements specified by the Ordering Party in the description of the subject matter of the contract. This means that the equivalent product must have parameters not worse than those indicated by the Ordering Party, i.e. at least at a level such as required by the Ordering Party. The use of equivalent products shall not degrade the quality of the results achieved or adversely affect the proper use or functioning of the product or service for their intended purpose.

If the Contractor proposes qualitatively equivalent products or services to the products indicated by the Contractor, the Contractor shall demonstrate

in an offer that the products or services offered by him meet the requirements laid down by the Contracting Authority, by submitting the means of evidence in question referred to in Articles 104-107 of the Pzp Act, proving that the proposed solutions meet the requirements set out in the equivalent extent description of the object of the order.

2) Where the description of the subject of the contract refers to standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and technical reference systems referred to in Article 101 (1) (2) and paragraph 3 of the Law of the PZP Contracting Authority shall allow solutions equivalent to those described and accompanied by such reference the words “or equivalent”. The Contractor which offers solutions equivalent to the specified standards shall be obliged to demonstrate in the offer that the equivalent solution offered by him meets the requirements set by the Contracting Authority, by indicating in the tender form an equivalent standard to the product offered and attaching to the the offers of the means of evidence referred to in Articles 104 - 107 of the Pzp Act, proving that the proposed solutions to standards meet the requirements set out in the description of the subject matter of the contract.

3) If the Contractor fails to submit the means of evidence in question or the evidence submitted is incomplete (thus not confirming the equivalence of the offer to the extent described in the description of the subject matter of the contract), the Contracting Party shall not call for their submission of /supplementation. All costs and activities related to confirming the fulfillment of the offer equivalent to the quality parameters shall rest with the Contractor.

1. The subject of this contract is successive deliveries of medical devices for the Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Institute of Oncology – National Research Institute Branch in Gliwice, hereinafter referred to as the Ordering Party.

2. The description of the object of the contract and the conditions for the execution of the order are contained in

1) Assortment and price specification – Annex 2.12 to the SWZ,

2) Draft provisions of the agreement that will be introduced into the content of the contract – Annex 4 to the SWZ.

Information clause arising from Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of individuals in connection with the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC The Ordering Authority posted in SWZ.

The Contracting Authority does not provide for the conclusion of a framework agreement, the establishment of a dynamic purchasing system, electronic auctions and supplementary orders.

The proceedings do not cover the objections set out in Article 94 of the Pzp Act.

Information on the Contractors' joint application for the award of the contract is contained in Chapter IX of the SWZ.

Description of equivalence.

1) Where the description of the subject of the contract is described by the indication of trademarks, patents or origin, source or specific process which characterizes the products or services provided by a specific Contractor shall allow solutions equivalent to the described, and such indication is accompanied by the words 'or equivalent'.

The phrase 'equivalent' means that the Contracting Party authorises products or services that meet the minimum quality, operational and technical requirements corresponding to the requirements specified by the Ordering Party in the description of the subject matter of the contract. This means that the equivalent product must have parameters not worse than those indicated by the Ordering Party, i.e. at least at a level such as required by the Ordering Party. The use of equivalent products shall not degrade the quality of the results achieved or adversely affect the proper use or functioning of the product or service for their intended purpose.

If the Contractor proposes qualitatively equivalent products or services to the products indicated by the Contractor, the Contractor shall demonstrate

in an offer that the products or services offered by him meet the requirements laid down by the Contracting Authority, by submitting the means of evidence in question referred to in Articles 104-107 of the Pzp Act, proving that the proposed solutions meet the requirements set out in the equivalent extent description of the object of the order.

2) Where the description of the subject of the contract refers to standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and technical reference systems referred to in Article 101 (1) (2) and paragraph 3 of the Law of the PZP Contracting Authority shall allow solutions equivalent to those described and accompanied by such reference the words “or equivalent”. The Contractor which offers solutions equivalent to the specified standards shall be obliged to demonstrate in the offer that the equivalent solution offered by him meets the requirements set by the Contracting Authority, by indicating in the tender form an equivalent standard to the product offered and attaching to the the offers of the means of evidence referred to in Articles 104 - 107 of the Pzp Act, proving that the proposed solutions to standards meet the requirements set out in the description of the subject matter of the contract.

3) If the Contractor fails to submit the means of evidence in question or the evidence submitted is incomplete (thus not confirming the equivalence of the offer to the extent described in the description of the subject matter of the contract), the Contracting Party shall not call for their submission of /supplementation. All costs and activities related to confirming the fulfillment of the offer equivalent to the quality parameters shall rest with the Contractor.

1. The subject of this contract is successive deliveries of medical devices for the Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Institute of Oncology – National Research Institute Branch in Gliwice, hereinafter referred to as the Ordering Party.

2. The description of the object of the contract and the conditions for the execution of the order are contained in

1) Assortment and price specification – Annex 2.13 to the SWZ,

2) Draft provisions of the agreement that will be introduced into the content of the contract – Annex 4 to the SWZ.

Information clause arising from Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of individuals in connection with the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC The Ordering Authority posted in SWZ.

The Contracting Authority does not provide for the conclusion of a framework agreement, the establishment of a dynamic purchasing system, electronic auctions and supplementary orders.

The proceedings do not cover the objections set out in Article 94 of the Pzp Act.

Information on the Contractors' joint application for the award of the contract is contained in Chapter IX of the SWZ.

Description of equivalence.

1) Where the description of the subject of the contract is described by the indication of trademarks, patents or origin, source or specific process which characterizes the products or services provided by a specific Contractor shall allow solutions equivalent to the described, and such indication is accompanied by the words 'or equivalent'.

The phrase 'equivalent' means that the Contracting Party authorises products or services that meet the minimum quality, operational and technical requirements corresponding to the requirements specified by the Ordering Party in the description of the subject matter of the contract. This means that the equivalent product must have parameters not worse than those indicated by the Ordering Party, i.e. at least at a level such as required by the Ordering Party. The use of equivalent products shall not degrade the quality of the results achieved or adversely affect the proper use or functioning of the product or service for their intended purpose.

If the Contractor proposes qualitatively equivalent products or services to the products indicated by the Contractor, the Contractor shall demonstrate

in an offer that the products or services offered by him meet the requirements laid down by the Contracting Authority, by submitting the means of evidence in question referred to in Articles 104-107 of the Pzp Act, proving that the proposed solutions meet the requirements set out in the equivalent extent description of the object of the order.

2) Where the description of the subject of the contract refers to standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and technical reference systems referred to in Article 101 (1) (2) and paragraph 3 of the Law of the PZP Contracting Authority shall allow solutions equivalent to those described and accompanied by such reference the words “or equivalent”. The Contractor which offers solutions equivalent to the specified standards shall be obliged to demonstrate in the offer that the equivalent solution offered by him meets the requirements set by the Contracting Authority, by indicating in the tender form an equivalent standard to the product offered and attaching to the the offers of the means of evidence referred to in Articles 104 - 107 of the Pzp Act, proving that the proposed solutions to standards meet the requirements set out in the description of the subject matter of the contract.

3) If the Contractor fails to submit the means of evidence in question or the evidence submitted is incomplete (thus not confirming the equivalence of the offer to the extent described in the description of the subject matter of the contract), the Contracting Party shall not call for their submission of /supplementation. All costs and activities related to confirming the fulfillment of the offer equivalent to the quality parameters shall rest with the Contractor.

1. The subject of this contract is successive deliveries of medical devices for the Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Institute of Oncology – National Research Institute Branch in Gliwice, hereinafter referred to as the Ordering Party.

2. The description of the object of the contract and the conditions for the execution of the order are contained in

1) Assortment and price specification – Annex 2.14 to SWZ,

2) Draft provisions of the agreement that will be introduced into the content of the contract – Annex 4 to the SWZ.

Information clause arising from Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of individuals in connection with the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC The Ordering Authority posted in SWZ.

The Contracting Authority does not provide for the conclusion of a framework agreement, the establishment of a dynamic purchasing system, electronic auctions and supplementary orders.

The proceedings do not cover the objections set out in Article 94 of the Pzp Act.

Information on the Contractors' joint application for the award of the contract is contained in Chapter IX of the SWZ.

Description of equivalence.

1) Where the description of the subject of the contract is described by the indication of trademarks, patents or origin, source or specific process which characterizes the products or services provided by a specific Contractor shall allow solutions equivalent to the described, and such indication is accompanied by the words 'or equivalent'.

The phrase 'equivalent' means that the Contracting Party authorises products or services that meet the minimum quality, operational and technical requirements corresponding to the requirements specified by the Ordering Party in the description of the subject matter of the contract. This means that the equivalent product must have parameters not worse than those indicated by the Ordering Party, i.e. at least at a level such as required by the Ordering Party. The use of equivalent products shall not degrade the quality of the results achieved or adversely affect the proper use or functioning of the product or service for their intended purpose.

If the Contractor proposes qualitatively equivalent products or services to the products indicated by the Contractor, the Contractor shall demonstrate

in an offer that the products or services offered by him meet the requirements laid down by the Contracting Authority, by submitting the means of evidence in question referred to in Articles 104-107 of the Pzp Act, proving that the proposed solutions meet the requirements set out in the equivalent extent description of the object of the order.

2) Where the description of the subject of the contract refers to standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and technical reference systems referred to in Article 101 (1) (2) and paragraph 3 of the Law of the PZP Contracting Authority shall allow solutions equivalent to those described and accompanied by such reference the words “or equivalent”. The Contractor which offers solutions equivalent to the specified standards shall be obliged to demonstrate in the offer that the equivalent solution offered by him meets the requirements set by the Contracting Authority, by indicating in the tender form an equivalent standard to the product offered and attaching to the the offers of the means of evidence referred to in Articles 104 - 107 of the Pzp Act, proving that the proposed solutions to standards meet the requirements set out in the description of the subject matter of the contract.

3) If the Contractor fails to submit the means of evidence in question or the evidence submitted is incomplete (thus not confirming the equivalence of the offer to the extent described in the description of the subject matter of the contract), the Contracting Party shall not call for their submission of /supplementation. All costs and activities related to confirming the fulfillment of the offer equivalent to the quality parameters shall rest with the Contractor.

1. The subject of this contract is successive deliveries of medical devices for the Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Institute of Oncology – National Research Institute Branch in Gliwice, hereinafter referred to as the Ordering Party.

2. The description of the object of the contract and the conditions for the execution of the order are contained in

1) Assortment and price specification – Annex 2.15 to the SWZ,

2) Draft provisions of the agreement that will be introduced into the content of the contract – Annex 4 to the SWZ.

Information clause arising from Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of individuals in connection with the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC The Ordering Authority posted in SWZ.

The Contracting Authority does not provide for the conclusion of a framework agreement, the establishment of a dynamic purchasing system, electronic auctions and supplementary orders.

The proceedings do not cover the objections set out in Article 94 of the Pzp Act.

Information on the Contractors' joint application for the award of the contract is contained in Chapter IX of the SWZ.

Description of equivalence.

1) Where the description of the subject of the contract is described by the indication of trademarks, patents or origin, source or specific process which characterizes the products or services provided by a specific Contractor shall allow solutions equivalent to the described, and such indication is accompanied by the words 'or equivalent'.

The phrase 'equivalent' means that the Contracting Party authorises products or services that meet the minimum quality, operational and technical requirements corresponding to the requirements specified by the Ordering Party in the description of the subject matter of the contract. This means that the equivalent product must have parameters not worse than those indicated by the Ordering Party, i.e. at least at a level such as required by the Ordering Party. The use of equivalent products shall not degrade the quality of the results achieved or adversely affect the proper use or functioning of the product or service for their intended purpose.

If the Contractor proposes qualitatively equivalent products or services to the products indicated by the Contractor, the Contractor shall demonstrate

in an offer that the products or services offered by him meet the requirements laid down by the Contracting Authority, by submitting the means of evidence in question referred to in Articles 104-107 of the Pzp Act, proving that the proposed solutions meet the requirements set out in the equivalent extent description of the object of the order.

2) Where the description of the subject of the contract refers to standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and technical reference systems referred to in Article 101 (1) (2) and paragraph 3 of the Law of the PZP Contracting Authority shall allow solutions equivalent to those described and accompanied by such reference the words “or equivalent”. The Contractor which offers solutions equivalent to the specified standards shall be obliged to demonstrate in the offer that the equivalent solution offered by him meets the requirements set by the Contracting Authority, by indicating in the tender form an equivalent standard to the product offered and attaching to the the offers of the means of evidence referred to in Articles 104 - 107 of the Pzp Act, proving that the proposed solutions to standards meet the requirements set out in the description of the subject matter of the contract.

3) If the Contractor fails to submit the means of evidence in question or the evidence submitted is incomplete (thus not confirming the equivalence of the offer to the extent described in the description of the subject matter of the contract), the Contracting Party shall not call for their submission of /supplementation. All costs and activities related to confirming the fulfillment of the offer equivalent to the quality parameters shall rest with the Contractor.

1. The subject of this contract is successive deliveries of medical devices for the Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Institute of Oncology – National Research Institute Branch in Gliwice, hereinafter referred to as the Ordering Party.

2. The description of the object of the contract and the conditions for the execution of the order are contained in

1) Assortment and price specification – Annex 2.2 to the SWZ,

2) Draft provisions of the agreement that will be introduced into the content of the contract – Annex 4 to the SWZ.

Information clause arising from Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of individuals in connection with the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC The Ordering Authority posted in SWZ.

The Contracting Authority does not provide for the conclusion of a framework agreement, the establishment of a dynamic purchasing system, electronic auctions and supplementary orders.

The proceedings do not cover the objections set out in Article 94 of the Pzp Act.

Information on the Contractors' joint application for the award of the contract is contained in Chapter IX of the SWZ.

Description of equivalence.

1) Where the description of the subject of the contract is described by the indication of trademarks, patents or origin, source or specific process which characterizes the products or services provided by a specific Contractor shall allow solutions equivalent to the described, and such indication is accompanied by the words 'or equivalent'.

The phrase 'equivalent' means that the Contracting Party authorises products or services that meet the minimum quality, operational and technical requirements corresponding to the requirements specified by the Ordering Party in the description of the subject matter of the contract. This means that the equivalent product must have parameters not worse than those indicated by the Ordering Party, i.e. at least at a level such as required by the Ordering Party. The use of equivalent products shall not degrade the quality of the results achieved or adversely affect the proper use or functioning of the product or service for their intended purpose.

If the Contractor proposes qualitatively equivalent products or services to the products indicated by the Contractor, the Contractor shall demonstrate

in an offer that the products or services offered by him meet the requirements laid down by the Contracting Authority, by submitting the means of evidence in question referred to in Articles 104-107 of the Pzp Act, proving that the proposed solutions meet the requirements set out in the equivalent extent description of the object of the order.

2) Where the description of the subject of the contract refers to standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and technical reference systems referred to in Article 101 (1) (2) and paragraph 3 of the Law of the PZP Contracting Authority shall allow solutions equivalent to those described and accompanied by such reference the words “or equivalent”. The Contractor which offers solutions equivalent to the specified standards shall be obliged to demonstrate in the offer that the equivalent solution offered by him meets the requirements set by the Contracting Authority, by indicating in the tender form an equivalent standard to the product offered and attaching to the the offers of the means of evidence referred to in Articles 104 - 107 of the Pzp Act, proving that the proposed solutions to standards meet the requirements set out in the description of the subject matter of the contract.

3) If the Contractor fails to submit the means of evidence in question or the evidence submitted is incomplete (thus not confirming the equivalence of the offer to the extent described in the description of the subject matter of the contract), the Contracting Party shall not call for their submission of /supplementation. All costs and activities related to confirming the fulfillment of the offer equivalent to the quality parameters shall rest with the Contractor.

1. The subject of this contract is successive deliveries of medical devices for the Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Institute of Oncology – National Research Institute Branch in Gliwice, hereinafter referred to as the Ordering Party.

2. The description of the object of the contract and the conditions for the execution of the order are contained in

1) Assortment and price specification – Annex 2.3 to the SWZ,

2) Draft provisions of the agreement that will be introduced into the content of the contract – Annex 4 to the SWZ.

Information clause arising from Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of individuals in connection with the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC The Ordering Authority posted in SWZ.

The Contracting Authority does not provide for the conclusion of a framework agreement, the establishment of a dynamic purchasing system, electronic auctions and supplementary orders.

The proceedings do not cover the objections set out in Article 94 of the Pzp Act.

Information on the Contractors' joint application for the award of the contract is contained in Chapter IX of the SWZ.

Description of equivalence.

1) Where the description of the subject of the contract is described by the indication of trademarks, patents or origin, source or specific process which characterizes the products or services provided by a specific Contractor shall allow solutions equivalent to the described, and such indication is accompanied by the words 'or equivalent'.

The phrase 'equivalent' means that the Contracting Party authorises products or services that meet the minimum quality, operational and technical requirements corresponding to the requirements specified by the Ordering Party in the description of the subject matter of the contract. This means that the equivalent product must have parameters not worse than those indicated by the Ordering Party, i.e. at least at a level such as required by the Ordering Party. The use of equivalent products shall not degrade the quality of the results achieved or adversely affect the proper use or functioning of the product or service for their intended purpose.

If the Contractor proposes qualitatively equivalent products or services to the products indicated by the Contractor, the Contractor shall demonstrate

in an offer that the products or services offered by him meet the requirements laid down by the Contracting Authority, by submitting the means of evidence in question referred to in Articles 104-107 of the Pzp Act, proving that the proposed solutions meet the requirements set out in the equivalent extent description of the object of the order.

2) Where the description of the subject of the contract refers to standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and technical reference systems referred to in Article 101 (1) (2) and paragraph 3 of the Law of the PZP Contracting Authority shall allow solutions equivalent to those described and accompanied by such reference the words “or equivalent”. The Contractor which offers solutions equivalent to the specified standards shall be obliged to demonstrate in the offer that the equivalent solution offered by him meets the requirements set by the Contracting Authority, by indicating in the tender form an equivalent standard to the product offered and attaching to the the offers of the means of evidence referred to in Articles 104 - 107 of the Pzp Act, proving that the proposed solutions to standards meet the requirements set out in the description of the subject matter of the contract.

3) If the Contractor fails to submit the means of evidence in question or the evidence submitted is incomplete (thus not confirming the equivalence of the offer to the extent described in the description of the subject matter of the contract), the Contracting Party shall not call for their submission of /supplementation. All costs and activities related to confirming the fulfillment of the offer equivalent to the quality parameters shall rest with the Contractor.

1. The subject of this contract is successive deliveries of medical devices for the Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Institute of Oncology – National Research Institute Branch in Gliwice, hereinafter referred to as the Ordering Party.

2. The description of the object of the contract and the conditions for the execution of the order are contained in

1) Assortment and price specification – Annex 2.4 to the SWZ,

2) Draft provisions of the agreement that will be introduced into the content of the contract – Annex 4 to the SWZ.

Information clause arising from Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of individuals in connection with the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC The Ordering Authority posted in SWZ.

The Contracting Authority does not provide for the conclusion of a framework agreement, the establishment of a dynamic purchasing system, electronic auctions and supplementary orders.

The proceedings do not cover the objections set out in Article 94 of the Pzp Act.

Information on the Contractors' joint application for the award of the contract is contained in Chapter IX of the SWZ.

Description of equivalence.

1) Where the description of the subject of the contract is described by the indication of trademarks, patents or origin, source or specific process which characterizes the products or services provided by a specific Contractor shall allow solutions equivalent to the described, and such indication is accompanied by the words 'or equivalent'.

The phrase 'equivalent' means that the Contracting Party authorises products or services that meet the minimum quality, operational and technical requirements corresponding to the requirements specified by the Ordering Party in the description of the subject matter of the contract. This means that the equivalent product must have parameters not worse than those indicated by the Ordering Party, i.e. at least at a level such as required by the Ordering Party. The use of equivalent products shall not degrade the quality of the results achieved or adversely affect the proper use or functioning of the product or service for their intended purpose.

If the Contractor proposes qualitatively equivalent products or services to the products indicated by the Contractor, the Contractor shall demonstrate

in an offer that the products or services offered by him meet the requirements laid down by the Contracting Authority, by submitting the means of evidence in question referred to in Articles 104-107 of the Pzp Act, proving that the proposed solutions meet the requirements set out in the equivalent extent description of the object of the order.

2) Where the description of the subject of the contract refers to standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and technical reference systems referred to in Article 101 (1) (2) and paragraph 3 of the Law of the PZP Contracting Authority shall allow solutions equivalent to those described and accompanied by such reference the words “or equivalent”. The Contractor which offers solutions equivalent to the specified standards shall be obliged to demonstrate in the offer that the equivalent solution offered by him meets the requirements set by the Contracting Authority, by indicating in the tender form an equivalent standard to the product offered and attaching to the the offers of the means of evidence referred to in Articles 104 - 107 of the Pzp Act, proving that the proposed solutions to standards meet the requirements set out in the description of the subject matter of the contract.

3) If the Contractor fails to submit the means of evidence in question or the evidence submitted is incomplete (thus not confirming the equivalence of the offer to the extent described in the description of the subject matter of the contract), the Contracting Party shall not call for their submission of /supplementation. All costs and activities related to confirming the fulfillment of the offer equivalent to the quality parameters shall rest with the Contractor.

1. The subject of this contract is successive deliveries of medical devices for the Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Institute of Oncology – National Research Institute Branch in Gliwice, hereinafter referred to as the Ordering Party.

2. The description of the object of the contract and the conditions for the execution of the order are contained in

1) Assortment and price specification – Annex 2.5 to the SWZ,

2) Draft provisions of the agreement that will be introduced into the content of the contract – Annex 4 to the SWZ.

Information clause arising from Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of individuals in connection with the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC The Ordering Authority posted in SWZ.

The Contracting Authority does not provide for the conclusion of a framework agreement, the establishment of a dynamic purchasing system, electronic auctions and supplementary orders.

The proceedings do not cover the objections set out in Article 94 of the Pzp Act.

Information on the Contractors' joint application for the award of the contract is contained in Chapter IX of the SWZ.

Description of equivalence.

1) Where the description of the subject of the contract is described by the indication of trademarks, patents or origin, source or specific process which characterizes the products or services provided by a specific Contractor shall allow solutions equivalent to the described, and such indication is accompanied by the words 'or equivalent'.

The phrase 'equivalent' means that the Contracting Party authorises products or services that meet the minimum quality, operational and technical requirements corresponding to the requirements specified by the Ordering Party in the description of the subject matter of the contract. This means that the equivalent product must have parameters not worse than those indicated by the Ordering Party, i.e. at least at a level such as required by the Ordering Party. The use of equivalent products shall not degrade the quality of the results achieved or adversely affect the proper use or functioning of the product or service for their intended purpose.

If the Contractor proposes qualitatively equivalent products or services to the products indicated by the Contractor, the Contractor shall demonstrate

in an offer that the products or services offered by him meet the requirements laid down by the Contracting Authority, by submitting the means of evidence in question referred to in Articles 104-107 of the Pzp Act, proving that the proposed solutions meet the requirements set out in the equivalent extent description of the object of the order.

2) Where the description of the subject of the contract refers to standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and technical reference systems referred to in Article 101 (1) (2) and paragraph 3 of the Law of the PZP Contracting Authority shall allow solutions equivalent to those described and accompanied by such reference the words “or equivalent”. The Contractor which offers solutions equivalent to the specified standards shall be obliged to demonstrate in the offer that the equivalent solution offered by him meets the requirements set by the Contracting Authority, by indicating in the tender form an equivalent standard to the product offered and attaching to the the offers of the means of evidence referred to in Articles 104 - 107 of the Pzp Act, proving that the proposed solutions to standards meet the requirements set out in the description of the subject matter of the contract.

3) If the Contractor fails to submit the means of evidence in question or the evidence submitted is incomplete (thus not confirming the equivalence of the offer to the extent described in the description of the subject matter of the contract), the Contracting Party shall not call for their submission of /supplementation. All costs and activities related to confirming the fulfillment of the offer equivalent to the quality parameters shall rest with the Contractor.

1. The subject of this contract is successive deliveries of medical devices for the Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Institute of Oncology – National Research Institute Branch in Gliwice, hereinafter referred to as the Ordering Party.

2. The description of the object of the contract and the conditions for the execution of the order are contained in

1) Assortment and price specification – Annex 2.6 to the SWZ,

2) Draft provisions of the agreement that will be introduced into the content of the contract – Annex 4 to the SWZ.

Information clause arising from Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of individuals in connection with the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC The Ordering Authority posted in SWZ.

The Contracting Authority does not provide for the conclusion of a framework agreement, the establishment of a dynamic purchasing system, electronic auctions and supplementary orders.

The proceedings do not cover the objections set out in Article 94 of the Pzp Act.

Information on the Contractors' joint application for the award of the contract is contained in Chapter IX of the SWZ.

Description of equivalence.

1) Where the description of the subject of the contract is described by the indication of trademarks, patents or origin, source or specific process which characterizes the products or services provided by a specific Contractor shall allow solutions equivalent to the described, and such indication is accompanied by the words 'or equivalent'.

The phrase 'equivalent' means that the Contracting Party authorises products or services that meet the minimum quality, operational and technical requirements corresponding to the requirements specified by the Ordering Party in the description of the subject matter of the contract. This means that the equivalent product must have parameters not worse than those indicated by the Ordering Party, i.e. at least at a level such as required by the Ordering Party. The use of equivalent products shall not degrade the quality of the results achieved or adversely affect the proper use or functioning of the product or service for their intended purpose.

If the Contractor proposes qualitatively equivalent products or services to the products indicated by the Contractor, the Contractor shall demonstrate

in an offer that the products or services offered by him meet the requirements laid down by the Contracting Authority, by submitting the means of evidence in question referred to in Articles 104-107 of the Pzp Act, proving that the proposed solutions meet the requirements set out in the equivalent extent description of the object of the order.

2) Where the description of the subject of the contract refers to standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and technical reference systems referred to in Article 101 (1) (2) and paragraph 3 of the Law of the PZP Contracting Authority shall allow solutions equivalent to those described and accompanied by such reference the words “or equivalent”. The Contractor which offers solutions equivalent to the specified standards shall be obliged to demonstrate in the offer that the equivalent solution offered by him meets the requirements set by the Contracting Authority, by indicating in the tender form an equivalent standard to the product offered and attaching to the the offers of the means of evidence referred to in Articles 104 - 107 of the Pzp Act, proving that the proposed solutions to standards meet the requirements set out in the description of the subject matter of the contract.

3) If the Contractor fails to submit the means of evidence in question or the evidence submitted is incomplete (thus not confirming the equivalence of the offer to the extent described in the description of the subject matter of the contract), the Contracting Party shall not call for their submission of /supplementation. All costs and activities related to confirming the fulfillment of the offer equivalent to the quality parameters shall rest with the Contractor.

1. The subject of this contract is successive deliveries of medical devices for the Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Institute of Oncology – National Research Institute Branch in Gliwice, hereinafter referred to as the Ordering Party.

2. The description of the object of the contract and the conditions for the execution of the order are contained in

1) Assortment and price specification – Annex 2.7 to the SWZ,

2) Draft provisions of the agreement that will be introduced into the content of the contract – Annex 4 to the SWZ.

Information clause arising from Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of individuals in connection with the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC The Ordering Authority posted in SWZ.

The Contracting Authority does not provide for the conclusion of a framework agreement, the establishment of a dynamic purchasing system, electronic auctions and supplementary orders.

The proceedings do not cover the objections set out in Article 94 of the Pzp Act.

Information on the Contractors' joint application for the award of the contract is contained in Chapter IX of the SWZ.

Description of equivalence.

1) Where the description of the subject of the contract is described by the indication of trademarks, patents or origin, source or specific process which characterizes the products or services provided by a specific Contractor shall allow solutions equivalent to the described, and such indication is accompanied by the words 'or equivalent'.

The phrase 'equivalent' means that the Contracting Party authorises products or services that meet the minimum quality, operational and technical requirements corresponding to the requirements specified by the Ordering Party in the description of the subject matter of the contract. This means that the equivalent product must have parameters not worse than those indicated by the Ordering Party, i.e. at least at a level such as required by the Ordering Party. The use of equivalent products shall not degrade the quality of the results achieved or adversely affect the proper use or functioning of the product or service for their intended purpose.

If the Contractor proposes qualitatively equivalent products or services to the products indicated by the Contractor, the Contractor shall demonstrate

in an offer that the products or services offered by him meet the requirements laid down by the Contracting Authority, by submitting the means of evidence in question referred to in Articles 104-107 of the Pzp Act, proving that the proposed solutions meet the requirements set out in the equivalent extent description of the object of the order.

2) Where the description of the subject of the contract refers to standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and technical reference systems referred to in Article 101 (1) (2) and paragraph 3 of the Law of the PZP Contracting Authority shall allow solutions equivalent to those described and accompanied by such reference the words “or equivalent”. The Contractor which offers solutions equivalent to the specified standards shall be obliged to demonstrate in the offer that the equivalent solution offered by him meets the requirements set by the Contracting Authority, by indicating in the tender form an equivalent standard to the product offered and attaching to the the offers of the means of evidence referred to in Articles 104 - 107 of the Pzp Act, proving that the proposed solutions to standards meet the requirements set out in the description of the subject matter of the contract.

3) If the Contractor fails to submit the means of evidence in question or the evidence submitted is incomplete (thus not confirming the equivalence of the offer to the extent described in the description of the subject matter of the contract), the Contracting Party shall not call for their submission of /supplementation. All costs and activities related to confirming the fulfillment of the offer equivalent to the quality parameters shall rest with the Contractor.

1. The subject of this contract is successive deliveries of medical devices for the Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Institute of Oncology – National Research Institute Branch in Gliwice, hereinafter referred to as the Ordering Party.

2. The description of the object of the contract and the conditions for the execution of the order are contained in

1) Assortment and price specification – Annex 2.8 to the SWZ,

2) Draft provisions of the agreement that will be introduced into the content of the contract – Annex 4 to the SWZ.

Information clause arising from Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of individuals in connection with the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC The Ordering Authority posted in SWZ.

The Contracting Authority does not provide for the conclusion of a framework agreement, the establishment of a dynamic purchasing system, electronic auctions and supplementary orders.

The proceedings do not cover the objections set out in Article 94 of the Pzp Act.

Information on the Contractors' joint application for the award of the contract is contained in Chapter IX of the SWZ.

Description of equivalence.

1) Where the description of the subject of the contract is described by the indication of trademarks, patents or origin, source or specific process which characterizes the products or services provided by a specific Contractor shall allow solutions equivalent to the described, and such indication is accompanied by the words 'or equivalent'.

The phrase 'equivalent' means that the Contracting Party authorises products or services that meet the minimum quality, operational and technical requirements corresponding to the requirements specified by the Ordering Party in the description of the subject matter of the contract. This means that the equivalent product must have parameters not worse than those indicated by the Ordering Party, i.e. at least at a level such as required by the Ordering Party. The use of equivalent products shall not degrade the quality of the results achieved or adversely affect the proper use or functioning of the product or service for their intended purpose.

If the Contractor proposes qualitatively equivalent products or services to the products indicated by the Contractor, the Contractor shall demonstrate

in an offer that the products or services offered by him meet the requirements laid down by the Contracting Authority, by submitting the means of evidence in question referred to in Articles 104-107 of the Pzp Act, proving that the proposed solutions meet the requirements set out in the equivalent extent description of the object of the order.

2) Where the description of the subject of the contract refers to standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and technical reference systems referred to in Article 101 (1) (2) and paragraph 3 of the Law of the PZP Contracting Authority shall allow solutions equivalent to those described and accompanied by such reference the words “or equivalent”. The Contractor which offers solutions equivalent to the specified standards shall be obliged to demonstrate in the offer that the equivalent solution offered by him meets the requirements set by the Contracting Authority, by indicating in the tender form an equivalent standard to the product offered and attaching to the the offers of the means of evidence referred to in Articles 104 - 107 of the Pzp Act, proving that the proposed solutions to standards meet the requirements set out in the description of the subject matter of the contract.

3) If the Contractor fails to submit the means of evidence in question or the evidence submitted is incomplete (thus not confirming the equivalence of the offer to the extent described in the description of the subject matter of the contract), the Contracting Party shall not call for their submission of /supplementation. All costs and activities related to confirming the fulfillment of the offer equivalent to the quality parameters shall rest with the Contractor.

1. The subject of this contract is successive deliveries of medical devices for the Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Institute of Oncology – National Research Institute Branch in Gliwice, hereinafter referred to as the Ordering Party.

2. The description of the object of the contract and the conditions for the execution of the order are contained in

1) Assortment and price specification – Annex 2.9 to the SWZ,

2) Draft provisions of the agreement that will be introduced into the content of the contract – Annex 4 to the SWZ.

Information clause arising from Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of individuals in connection with the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC The Ordering Authority posted in SWZ.

The Contracting Authority does not provide for the conclusion of a framework agreement, the establishment of a dynamic purchasing system, electronic auctions and supplementary orders.

The proceedings do not cover the objections set out in Article 94 of the Pzp Act.

Information on the Contractors' joint application for the award of the contract is contained in Chapter IX of the SWZ.

Description of equivalence.

1) Where the description of the subject of the contract is described by the indication of trademarks, patents or origin, source or specific process which characterizes the products or services provided by a specific Contractor shall allow solutions equivalent to the described, and such indication is accompanied by the words 'or equivalent'.

The phrase 'equivalent' means that the Contracting Party authorises products or services that meet the minimum quality, operational and technical requirements corresponding to the requirements specified by the Ordering Party in the description of the subject matter of the contract. This means that the equivalent product must have parameters not worse than those indicated by the Ordering Party, i.e. at least at a level such as required by the Ordering Party. The use of equivalent products shall not degrade the quality of the results achieved or adversely affect the proper use or functioning of the product or service for their intended purpose.

If the Contractor proposes qualitatively equivalent products or services to the products indicated by the Contractor, the Contractor shall demonstrate

in an offer that the products or services offered by him meet the requirements laid down by the Contracting Authority, by submitting the means of evidence in question referred to in Articles 104-107 of the Pzp Act, proving that the proposed solutions meet the requirements set out in the equivalent extent description of the object of the order.

2) Where the description of the subject of the contract refers to standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and technical reference systems referred to in Article 101 (1) (2) and paragraph 3 of the Law of the PZP Contracting Authority shall allow solutions equivalent to those described and accompanied by such reference the words “or equivalent”. The Contractor which offers solutions equivalent to the specified standards shall be obliged to demonstrate in the offer that the equivalent solution offered by him meets the requirements set by the Contracting Authority, by indicating in the tender form an equivalent standard to the product offered and attaching to the the offers of the means of evidence referred to in Articles 104 - 107 of the Pzp Act, proving that the proposed solutions to standards meet the requirements set out in the description of the subject matter of the contract.

3) If the Contractor fails to submit the means of evidence in question or the evidence submitted is incomplete (thus not confirming the equivalence of the offer to the extent described in the description of the subject matter of the contract), the Contracting Party shall not call for their submission of /supplementation. All costs and activities related to confirming the fulfillment of the offer equivalent to the quality parameters shall rest with the Contractor.