The competition concerns the main and architectural design of the renovation and extension of the Tapiola Swimming Hall, which is of cultural historical significance, with its other tasks, as further defined in the call for tender below.
The Tapiola Swimming Hall was completed in 1965 and its architectural design has been handled by Aarne Ervi. The swimming hall has undergone a renovation and extension in 2005. The design and execution takes into account the cityscape, building artistic and architectural values of the Tapiola Swimming Hall, which will be preserved in connection with the repair and expansion in accordance with the conservation regulations of the Museum Agency and the ELY Centre.
Tapiola Swimming Hall is located in Tapiola, Espoo, RKY-area. The swimming pool is protected as a building of construction artistically value under the MRL section 57 (2), under the formula label sr-1.
All swimming pool facilities as well as outdoor areas will be repaired in conjunction with this project. The renovation, expansion and restoration of the swimming pool is a complex design and construction work that requires close cooperation with various authorities.
Scope of construction project: 3,767 hym
Annual visitor count: about 300,000 customers.
Target price for the construction project: approximately 29.9 million. EUR (0% VAT).
Target schedule: planning will begin no later than August 2021. The building will be completed in spring 2025.
Implementation format: collaborative project management bladder.
The acquisition and related requirements are described in more detail in the Annexes to the call for tender.
Main and architectural design of the Tapiola Swimming Hall, description of the tender:
The tender is 1 step.
1) Terms of eligibility
The tenderer shall present the office references in Annex 14a. Office references are minimum requirements and are not scored.
The eligibility conditions for the chief designer, the responsible building planner, their deputies and two (2) project architects, such as details of the qualification, qualification and language certificate requirements, are set out in Annex 13, the eligibility conditions for professional qualifications and reference criteria.
2) Quality points
The bidder presents key figures in the planning team:
— Chief Designer
— Designer in charge of building design, architect, building designer in the call for tender (ARK)
— Substitutes for the aforementioned designers.
The references of all the above designers should be presented in Annex 14b. Quality points are calculated from the references of the chief designer and the building designer. See Quality Points Calculation Formula: Annex 12 Scoring Table. Substitute references do not become quality points.
3) Price offer
Offices issue a price offer in Annex 05.
The main and architectural design are itemized to the price offer by design position.
The design offer must also include the landscape architecture design and transport planning of the courtyards and green spaces in the scope of the entire plot and planning area.
A tender for bulk furniture, kitchen and lighting design is also requested (a more detailed description in the list of tasks). The extent of the lighting design with regard to outdoor lighting is the design area shown in the reference plan.
See price point calculation formula: Appendix 12 Scoring table.
4) Assessment
On the basis of references, the subscriber first calculates quality scores for all providers. The subscriber then opens bidders' price quotes and calculates the price points and total points (see Annex 12 TUH, Scoring Table).
The bidder with the highest points in the quality section receives 75 reference points for the final bid comparison, to which the points received by the other bidders are proportioned. The bid score for the final comparison = the quality points received by the bid concerned divided by the quality points of the bid with the highest quality points and multiplied by 75 points.
The offer of the cheapest price will receive 20 reference points for the final comparison. The reference points for other bids are calculated as follows: the reference point of the bid = the price of the cheapest bid divided by the price of the bid concerned and multiplied by 20 points.
The offer of the cheapest average price will receive five (5) reference points for the final comparison. The reference points for other bids are calculated as follows: the reference point of the offer = the cheapest average average price divided by the relevant average average average price and multiplied by five (5) points. The average hour price is calculated by dividing the total of the bid by the aggregate number of hours of the design positions.
The architectural firm/working association with the best co-points (aggregate quality and price points) of the bidders is selected to manage the main and architectural design of the project.
5) The subscriber separately competes the following design areas
— Geo- and grounding design
— Structural design
— HVIA and energy design (sprinkler design is included in HVAC design)
— Water Treatment Planning
— Electrical design
— Acoustic design
— Fire engineering
— Data model coordination
— Moisture and purity coordinator
— Service book coordinator
— Security Coordinator.
The design of the project will be carried out by data modelling in respect of all design disciplines, thus requiring the planning parties to have knowledge model skills at the level required in the data model guidance.