1. The subject of the contract is the supply of surgical instruments for the needs of the Operating Block.

2. The subject of the contract for individual parts of the contract is described in detail in Appendix No. 1 and 2 to the SWZ.

3. The offered subject of the order must be compliant and approved for marketing and use in the territory of the Republic of Poland in accordance with the requirements of the Act of 7 April 2022 on medical devices, the European Union Directive 93/42/EEC of 14 June 1993 and Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2017 on medical devices, amending Directive 2001/83/EC, Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 and Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 and repealing Council Directives 90/385/EEC and 93/42/EEC. It must have Declarations of Conformity and CE Certificates.

4. The validity period of the products may not be shorter than 12 months from the moment of delivery to the Ordering Party's headquarters.

1. The subject of the contract is the supply of surgical instruments for the needs of the Operating Block - a universal set of tools for various procedures - I

2. The subject of the contract for individual parts of the contract is described in detail in Appendix No. 1 and 2 to the SWZ.

3. The offered subject of the order must be compliant and approved for marketing and use in the territory of the Republic of Poland in accordance with the requirements of the Act of 7 April 2022 on medical devices, the European Union Directive 93/42/EEC of 14 June 1993 and Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2017 on medical devices, amending Directive 2001/83/EC, Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 and Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 and repealing Council Directives 90/385/EEC and 93/42/EEC. It must have Declarations of Conformity and CE Certificates.

4. The validity period of the products may not be shorter than 12 months from the moment of delivery to the Ordering Party's headquarters.

5. The Ordering Party shall allow the submission of equivalent tenders which meet the conditions relating to the subject of the contract. If proper names appear in the description of the subject of the contract, they should be treated only as an example of a product that exactly corresponds to the description of the subject of the contract. In any such case, the Ordering Party allows the possibility of submitting an equivalent offer, however, provided that the equivalent product proposed by the Contractor will meet the minimum requirements of the same class as the Ordering Party expects, i.e. it will meet the requirements described by the Ordering Party. The product proposed as equivalent may not differ in quality, standard, technical parameters from those assumed by the Ordering Party. In the case of indicating trademarks or proper names, using the term "type", the Ordering Party allows the submission of equivalent offers in a given assortment. Whenever, as far as the description of an object is concerned, reference is made to a trade mark, a patent or origin, such an indication shall be deemed to be accompanied by the word 'or equivalent'. The Ordering Party shall consider as an equivalent assortment the one that has the same or better than the described technical and quality parameters, and its use will not in any way affect the proper functioning of the product in accordance with its intended purpose. The burden of proving equivalence is the responsibility of the Contractor. The Ordering Party shall not recognize equivalent solutions if they are worse than those indicated in Annex 1 and 2 to the SWZ from the minimum quality, functional, technical and technological requirements.

6. The subject of the contract will be delivered at the expense, risk and transport of the Contractor.

7. The place of delivery is the registered office of the Ordering Party:

1. The subject of the contract is the supply of surgical instruments for the needs of the Operating Block - a universal set of tools for various procedures - II.

2. The subject of the contract for individual parts of the contract is described in detail in Appendix No. 1 and 2 to the SWZ.

3. The offered subject of the order must be compliant and approved for marketing and use in the territory of the Republic of Poland in accordance with the requirements of the Act of 7 April 2022 on medical devices, the European Union Directive 93/42/EEC of 14 June 1993 and Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2017 on medical devices, amending Directive 2001/83/EC, Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 and Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 and repealing Council Directives 90/385/EEC and 93/42/EEC. It must have Declarations of Conformity and CE Certificates.

4. The validity period of the products may not be shorter than 12 months from the moment of delivery to the Ordering Party's headquarters.

5. The Ordering Party shall allow the submission of equivalent tenders which meet the conditions relating to the subject of the contract. If proper names appear in the description of the subject of the contract, they should be treated only as an example of a product that exactly corresponds to the description of the subject of the contract. In any such case, the Ordering Party allows the possibility of submitting an equivalent offer, however, provided that the equivalent product proposed by the Contractor will meet the minimum requirements of the same class as the Ordering Party expects, i.e. it will meet the requirements described by the Ordering Party. The product proposed as equivalent may not differ in quality, standard, technical parameters from those assumed by the Ordering Party. In the case of indicating trademarks or proper names, using the term "type", the Ordering Party allows the submission of equivalent offers in a given assortment. Whenever, as far as the description of an object is concerned, reference is made to a trade mark, a patent or origin, such an indication shall be deemed to be accompanied by the word 'or equivalent'. The Ordering Party shall consider as an equivalent assortment the one that has the same or better than the described technical and quality parameters, and its use will not in any way affect the proper functioning of the product in accordance with its intended purpose. The burden of proving equivalence is the responsibility of the Contractor. The Ordering Party shall not recognize equivalent solutions if they are worse than those indicated in Annex 1 and 2 to the SWZ from the minimum quality, functional, technical and technological requirements.

6. The subject of the contract will be delivered at the expense, risk and transport of the Contractor.

7. The place of delivery is the registered office of the Ordering Party:

1. The subject of the contract is the supply of surgical instruments for the needs of the Operating Block - a universal set of tools for various procedures - III.

2. The subject of the contract for individual parts of the contract is described in detail in Appendix No. 1 and 2 to the SWZ.

3. The offered subject of the order must be compliant and approved for marketing and use in the territory of the Republic of Poland in accordance with the requirements of the Act of 7 April 2022 on medical devices, the European Union Directive 93/42/EEC of 14 June 1993 and Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2017 on medical devices, amending Directive 2001/83/EC, Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 and Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 and repealing Council Directives 90/385/EEC and 93/42/EEC. It must have Declarations of Conformity and CE Certificates.

4. The validity period of the products may not be shorter than 12 months from the moment of delivery to the Ordering Party's headquarters.

5. The Ordering Party shall allow the submission of equivalent tenders which meet the conditions relating to the subject of the contract. If proper names appear in the description of the subject of the contract, they should be treated only as an example of a product that exactly corresponds to the description of the subject of the contract. In any such case, the Ordering Party allows the possibility of submitting an equivalent offer, however, provided that the equivalent product proposed by the Contractor will meet the minimum requirements of the same class as the Ordering Party expects, i.e. it will meet the requirements described by the Ordering Party. The product proposed as equivalent may not differ in quality, standard, technical parameters from those assumed by the Ordering Party. In the case of indicating trademarks or proper names, using the term "type", the Ordering Party allows the submission of equivalent offers in a given assortment. Whenever, as far as the description of an object is concerned, reference is made to a trade mark, a patent or origin, such an indication shall be deemed to be accompanied by the word 'or equivalent'. The Ordering Party shall consider as an equivalent assortment the one that has the same or better than the described technical and quality parameters, and its use will not in any way affect the proper functioning of the product in accordance with its intended purpose. The burden of proving equivalence is the responsibility of the Contractor. The Ordering Party shall not recognize equivalent solutions if they are worse than those indicated in Annex 1 and 2 to the SWZ from the minimum quality, functional, technical and technological requirements.

6. The subject of the contract will be delivered at the expense, risk and transport of the Contractor.

7. The place of delivery is the registered office of the Ordering Party:

1. The subject of the order is the supply of surgical instruments for the needs of the Operating Block - a set of surgical instruments for small bones.

2. The subject of the contract for individual parts of the contract is described in detail in Appendix No. 1 and 2 to the SWZ.

3. The offered subject of the order must be compliant and approved for marketing and use in the territory of the Republic of Poland in accordance with the requirements of the Act of 7 April 2022 on medical devices, the European Union Directive 93/42/EEC of 14 June 1993 and Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2017 on medical devices, amending Directive 2001/83/EC, Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 and Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 and repealing Council Directives 90/385/EEC and 93/42/EEC. It must have Declarations of Conformity and CE Certificates.

4. The validity period of the products may not be shorter than 12 months from the moment of delivery to the Ordering Party's headquarters.

5. The Ordering Party shall allow the submission of equivalent tenders which meet the conditions relating to the subject of the contract. If proper names appear in the description of the subject of the contract, they should be treated only as an example of a product that exactly corresponds to the description of the subject of the contract. In any such case, the Ordering Party allows the possibility of submitting an equivalent offer, however, provided that the equivalent product proposed by the Contractor will meet the minimum requirements of the same class as the Ordering Party expects, i.e. it will meet the requirements described by the Ordering Party. The product proposed as equivalent may not differ in quality, standard, technical parameters from those assumed by the Ordering Party. In the case of indicating trademarks or proper names, using the term "type", the Ordering Party allows the submission of equivalent offers in a given assortment. Whenever, as far as the description of an object is concerned, reference is made to a trade mark, a patent or origin, such an indication shall be deemed to be accompanied by the word 'or equivalent'. The Ordering Party shall consider as an equivalent assortment the one that has the same or better than the described technical and quality parameters, and its use will not in any way affect the proper functioning of the product in accordance with its intended purpose. The burden of proving equivalence is the responsibility of the Contractor. The Ordering Party shall not recognize equivalent solutions if they are worse than those indicated in Annex 1 and 2 to the SWZ from the minimum quality, functional, technical and technological requirements.

6. The subject of the contract will be delivered at the expense, risk and transport of the Contractor.

7. The place of delivery is the registered office of the Ordering Party:

1. The subject of the contract is the supply of surgical instruments for the needs of the Operating Block - a set of surgical instruments for medium bones.

2. The subject of the contract for individual parts of the contract is described in detail in Appendix No. 1 and 2 to the SWZ.

3. The offered subject of the order must be compliant and approved for marketing and use in the territory of the Republic of Poland in accordance with the requirements of the Act of 7 April 2022 on medical devices, the European Union Directive 93/42/EEC of 14 June 1993 and Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2017 on medical devices, amending Directive 2001/83/EC, Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 and Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 and repealing Council Directives 90/385/EEC and 93/42/EEC. It must have Declarations of Conformity and CE Certificates.

4. The validity period of the products may not be shorter than 12 months from the moment of delivery to the Ordering Party's headquarters.

5. The Ordering Party shall allow the submission of equivalent tenders which meet the conditions relating to the subject of the contract. If proper names appear in the description of the subject of the contract, they should be treated only as an example of a product that exactly corresponds to the description of the subject of the contract. In any such case, the Ordering Party allows the possibility of submitting an equivalent offer, however, provided that the equivalent product proposed by the Contractor will meet the minimum requirements of the same class as the Ordering Party expects, i.e. it will meet the requirements described by the Ordering Party. The product proposed as equivalent may not differ in quality, standard, technical parameters from those assumed by the Ordering Party. In the case of indicating trademarks or proper names, using the term "type", the Ordering Party allows the submission of equivalent offers in a given assortment. Whenever, as far as the description of an object is concerned, reference is made to a trade mark, a patent or origin, such an indication shall be deemed to be accompanied by the word 'or equivalent'. The Ordering Party shall consider as an equivalent assortment the one that has the same or better than the described technical and quality parameters, and its use will not in any way affect the proper functioning of the product in accordance with its intended purpose. The burden of proving equivalence is the responsibility of the Contractor. The Ordering Party shall not recognize equivalent solutions if they are worse than those indicated in Annex 1 and 2 to the SWZ from the minimum quality, functional, technical and technological requirements.

6. The subject of the contract will be delivered at the expense, risk and transport of the Contractor.

7. The place of delivery is the registered office of the Ordering Party:

1. The subject of the contract is the supply of surgical instruments for the needs of the Operating Block - a set of surgical instruments for large bones.

2. The subject of the contract for individual parts of the contract is described in detail in Appendix No. 1 and 2 to the SWZ.

3. The offered subject of the order must be compliant and approved for marketing and use in the territory of the Republic of Poland in accordance with the requirements of the Act of 7 April 2022 on medical devices, the European Union Directive 93/42/EEC of 14 June 1993 and Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2017 on medical devices, amending Directive 2001/83/EC, Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 and Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 and repealing Council Directives 90/385/EEC and 93/42/EEC. It must have Declarations of Conformity and CE Certificates.

4. The validity period of the products may not be shorter than 12 months from the moment of delivery to the Ordering Party's headquarters.

5. The Ordering Party shall allow the submission of equivalent tenders which meet the conditions relating to the subject of the contract. If proper names appear in the description of the subject of the contract, they should be treated only as an example of a product that exactly corresponds to the description of the subject of the contract. In any such case, the Ordering Party allows the possibility of submitting an equivalent offer, however, provided that the equivalent product proposed by the Contractor will meet the minimum requirements of the same class as the Ordering Party expects, i.e. it will meet the requirements described by the Ordering Party. The product proposed as equivalent may not differ in quality, standard, technical parameters from those assumed by the Ordering Party. In the case of indicating trademarks or proper names, using the term "type", the Ordering Party allows the submission of equivalent offers in a given assortment. Whenever, as far as the description of an object is concerned, reference is made to a trade mark, a patent or origin, such an indication shall be deemed to be accompanied by the word 'or equivalent'. The Ordering Party shall consider as an equivalent assortment the one that has the same or better than the described technical and quality parameters, and its use will not in any way affect the proper functioning of the product in accordance with its intended purpose. The burden of proving equivalence is the responsibility of the Contractor. The Ordering Party shall not recognize equivalent solutions if they are worse than those indicated in Annex 1 and 2 to the SWZ from the minimum quality, functional, technical and technological requirements.

6. The subject of the contract will be delivered at the expense, risk and transport of the Contractor.

7. The place of delivery is the registered office of the Ordering Party:

1. The subject of the contract is the supply of surgical instruments for the needs of the Operating Block - a set of surgical instruments for the spine.

2. The subject of the contract for individual parts of the contract is described in detail in Appendix No. 1 and 2 to the SWZ.

3. The offered subject of the order must be compliant and approved for marketing and use in the territory of the Republic of Poland in accordance with the requirements of the Act of 7 April 2022 on medical devices, the European Union Directive 93/42/EEC of 14 June 1993 and Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2017 on medical devices, amending Directive 2001/83/EC, Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 and Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 and repealing Council Directives 90/385/EEC and 93/42/EEC. It must have Declarations of Conformity and CE Certificates.

4. The validity period of the products may not be shorter than 12 months from the moment of delivery to the Ordering Party's headquarters.

5. The Ordering Party shall allow the submission of equivalent tenders which meet the conditions relating to the subject of the contract. If proper names appear in the description of the subject of the contract, they should be treated only as an example of a product that exactly corresponds to the description of the subject of the contract. In any such case, the Ordering Party allows the possibility of submitting an equivalent offer, however, provided that the equivalent product proposed by the Contractor will meet the minimum requirements of the same class as the Ordering Party expects, i.e. it will meet the requirements described by the Ordering Party. The product proposed as equivalent may not differ in quality, standard, technical parameters from those assumed by the Ordering Party. In the case of indicating trademarks or proper names, using the term "type", the Ordering Party allows the submission of equivalent offers in a given assortment. Whenever, as far as the description of an object is concerned, reference is made to a trade mark, a patent or origin, such an indication shall be deemed to be accompanied by the word 'or equivalent'. The Ordering Party shall consider as an equivalent assortment the one that has the same or better than the described technical and quality parameters, and its use will not in any way affect the proper functioning of the product in accordance with its intended purpose. The burden of proving equivalence is the responsibility of the Contractor. The Ordering Party shall not recognize equivalent solutions if they are worse than those indicated in Annex 1 and 2 to the SWZ from the minimum quality, functional, technical and technological requirements.

6. The subject of the contract will be delivered at the expense, risk and transport of the Contractor.

7. The place of delivery is the registered office of the Ordering Party:

1. The subject of the contract is the supply of surgical instruments for the needs of the Operating Block - various tools - I

2. The subject of the contract for individual parts of the contract is described in detail in Appendix No. 1 and 2 to the SWZ.

3. The offered subject of the order must be compliant and approved for marketing and use in the territory of the Republic of Poland in accordance with the requirements of the Act of 7 April 2022 on medical devices, the European Union Directive 93/42/EEC of 14 June 1993 and Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2017 on medical devices, amending Directive 2001/83/EC, Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 and Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 and repealing Council Directives 90/385/EEC and 93/42/EEC. It must have Declarations of Conformity and CE Certificates.

4. The validity period of the products may not be shorter than 12 months from the moment of delivery to the Ordering Party's headquarters.

5. The Ordering Party shall allow the submission of equivalent tenders which meet the conditions relating to the subject of the contract. If proper names appear in the description of the subject of the contract, they should be treated only as an example of a product that exactly corresponds to the description of the subject of the contract. In any such case, the Ordering Party allows the possibility of submitting an equivalent offer, however, provided that the equivalent product proposed by the Contractor will meet the minimum requirements of the same class as the Ordering Party expects, i.e. it will meet the requirements described by the Ordering Party. The product proposed as equivalent may not differ in quality, standard, technical parameters from those assumed by the Ordering Party. In the case of indicating trademarks or proper names, using the term "type", the Ordering Party allows the submission of equivalent offers in a given assortment. Whenever, as far as the description of an object is concerned, reference is made to a trade mark, a patent or origin, such an indication shall be deemed to be accompanied by the word 'or equivalent'. The Ordering Party shall consider as an equivalent assortment the one that has the same or better than the described technical and quality parameters, and its use will not in any way affect the proper functioning of the product in accordance with its intended purpose. The burden of proving equivalence is the responsibility of the Contractor. The Ordering Party shall not recognize equivalent solutions if they are worse than those indicated in Annex 1 and 2 to the SWZ from the minimum quality, functional, technical and technological requirements.

6. The subject of the contract will be delivered at the expense, risk and transport of the Contractor.

7. The place of delivery is the registered office of the Ordering Party:

1. The subject of the contract is the supply of surgical instruments for the needs of the Operating Block - various tools - II.

2. The subject of the contract for individual parts of the contract is described in detail in Appendix No. 1 and 2 to the SWZ.

3. The offered subject of the order must be compliant and approved for marketing and use in the territory of the Republic of Poland in accordance with the requirements of the Act of 7 April 2022 on medical devices, the European Union Directive 93/42/EEC of 14 June 1993 and Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2017 on medical devices, amending Directive 2001/83/EC, Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 and Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 and repealing Council Directives 90/385/EEC and 93/42/EEC. It must have Declarations of Conformity and CE Certificates.

4. The validity period of the products may not be shorter than 12 months from the moment of delivery to the Ordering Party's headquarters.

5. The Ordering Party shall allow the submission of equivalent tenders which meet the conditions relating to the subject of the contract. If proper names appear in the description of the subject of the contract, they should be treated only as an example of a product that exactly corresponds to the description of the subject of the contract. In any such case, the Ordering Party allows the possibility of submitting an equivalent offer, however, provided that the equivalent product proposed by the Contractor will meet the minimum requirements of the same class as the Ordering Party expects, i.e. it will meet the requirements described by the Ordering Party. The product proposed as equivalent may not differ in quality, standard, technical parameters from those assumed by the Ordering Party. In the case of indicating trademarks or proper names, using the term "type", the Ordering Party allows the submission of equivalent offers in a given assortment. Whenever, as far as the description of an object is concerned, reference is made to a trade mark, a patent or origin, such an indication shall be deemed to be accompanied by the word 'or equivalent'. The Ordering Party shall consider as an equivalent assortment the one that has the same or better than the described technical and quality parameters, and its use will not in any way affect the proper functioning of the product in accordance with its intended purpose. The burden of proving equivalence is the responsibility of the Contractor. The Ordering Party shall not recognize equivalent solutions if they are worse than those indicated in Annex 1 and 2 to the SWZ from the minimum quality, functional, technical and technological requirements.

6. The subject of the contract will be delivered at the expense, risk and transport of the Contractor.

7. The place of delivery is the registered office of the Ordering Party: