1. The subject of the contract is the expansion of the existing HCI cluster, the purchase, delivery of hyperconverged infrastructure (HCI), and licenses along with the implementation and provision of warranty services.
2. The description of the subject of the contract (OPZ) is included in Annex 1 to the SWZ.
3. The contracting authority does not allow the submission of variant offers, does not specify employment requirements on the basis of an employment relationship, in the circumstances referred to in Article 95 of the Act, and requirements for the employment of persons referred to in Article 96(2)(2) of the PPL Act, does not reserve the right to apply for the award of a contract only by contractors referred to in Article 94 of the Act, does not provide for the award of contracts referred to in Article 214(1)(8) of the Act, does not provide for a local inspection and verification by the contractor of the documents necessary for the performance of the contract available on the spot at the contracting authority, does not provide for the conclusion of a framework agreement,
1. The subject of the contract is the expansion of the existing HCI cluster, the purchase, delivery of hyperconverged infrastructure (HCI), and licenses along with the implementation and provision of warranty services.
2. The subject of the order includes:
a) Development of the Hyperconverged Infrastructure Expansion (HCI) Implementation Project
in the IT environment of the UMWŚ together with the work schedule.
b) Delivery of HCI nodes, software and required licenses.
c) Installation and implementation of HCI nodes in the UMWŚ infrastructure in accordance with the Implementation Project referred to in point 1.
d) Provision of technical support services in accordance with the provisions of the OPZ.
e) Provision of warranty service in accordance with the provisions of OPZ.
3. Description of the object of the order (OPZ) is contained in Annex 1 to the SWZ.
4. The Contracting Authority provides for the use of the so-called reverse procedure referred to in Article 139(1) of the PPL Act, i.e. the contracting authority will first examine and evaluate the tenders, and then make a subjective qualification of the Contractor whose offer has been rated the highest, in terms of the lack of grounds for exclusion and meeting the conditions for participation in the procedure.
5. The Ordering Party has not divided this contract into parts and does not allow the submission of partial tenders, because the scope and nature of the subject of the contract exclude its division for organizational, economic and teleological reasons.
Information on the evidence in question
1. The Ordering Party requests to submit together with the offer to confirm that the offered deliveries meet the requirements specified by the Ordering Party in terms of processor performance in the absence of publication of the PassMark – CPU Mark test for the offered processor for the server specified in item 6. Appendix No. 1 to SWZ – the result of a test carried out independently by the contractor, assuming that the test is carried out on the installed version of Microsoft Windows Server 2019 without any modification (tuning and optimization).
2. The Ordering Party requires that the documents indicated in point 1 drawn up in a language other than English be submitted together with a translation into the language of the Polish.
3.The Contracting Authority accepts equivalent means of proof if it confirms that the services offered meet the requirements, characteristics or criteria specified by the Contracting Authority.
4.If the contractor does not submit the means of proof in question or the evidence in question is incomplete, the contracting authority shall call for their submission or completion within the prescribed period.
5.The contracting authority may request from contractors explanations regarding the content of the means of proof in question.