Biodiversity Conservation and Offsets in the Upper Tina Catchment
Bid Reference: SB-MMERE-531623-CS-QCBS
Procurement method: Quality And Cost-Based Selection
World Bank project No. : P161319
| Ministry of Mines, Energy and Rural Electrification (MMERE) Project Number: P161319, IDA Grant No: E462-SB The Government of Solomon Islands (SIG) |
REQUEST FOR EXPRESSIONS OF INTEREST
Consulting Services (Firm)
Assignment: Biodiversity Conservation and Offsets in the Upper Tina Catchment: SB-MMERE-531623-CS-QCBS
Minimum Experience
Technical and Thematic Experience in;
Safeguards and Standards
Address for Enquiries and Submission of EOIs
Ministry of Mines, Energy and Rural Electrification (MMERE)
Project Office – Tina River Hydropower Development Project, Honiara, Solomon Islands
Attention: Pradip Verma, Project Manager, E-mail: pradip.verma@tina-hydro.com
| Ministry of Mines, Energy and Rural Electrification (MMERE) Project Number: P161319, IDA Grant No: E462-SB The Government of Solomon Islands (SIG) |
TERMS OF REFERENCE
Assignment: Biodiversity Conservation and Offsets in the Upper Tina Catchment: SB-MMERE-531623-CS-QCBS
Glossary
ADB – Asian Development Bank
AOMS – Aquatic Offset Management Strategy
BMP – Biodiversity Management Plan
ECD – Environment and Conservation Division
ESIA – Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
FAO – Food and Agriculture Organization
GRM – Grievance Redress Mechanism
IFC – International Finance Corporation
M&E – Monitoring and Evaluation
MECDM – Ministry of Environment, Climate Change, Disaster Management and Meteorology
MMERE – Ministry of Mines, Energy and Rural Electrification
MOFR – Ministry of Forestry and Research
NG/NNL – Net Gain/No Net Loss
NGO – Non-Governmental Organization
PAMC – Protected Area Management Committee
PAMP – Project Area Management Plan
SIG – Solomon Islands Government
SOP – Standard Operating Procedure
TCLC – Tina Core Land Company Pty Ltd
THL – Tina Hydropower Limited
TOMS – Terrestrial Offset Management Strategy
TRHDP – Tina River Hydropower Development Project
Table of Contents
1......... Introduction. 5
2......... Background of Upper Tina Catchment (Upper Tina Catchment) 5
2.1....... Tina River Hydropower Development Project 5
2.2....... Background of Upper Tina Catchment (Upper Tina Catchment) Conservation Targets. 6
2.3....... Rationale for Consultancy Firm.. 6
2.4....... Roles, Responsibilities and Key Stakeholders. 7
3......... Scope of Work. 8
3.1....... Overview.. 8
3.2....... Part One Preparatory Analysis, Plan of Management and Stakeholder Engagement 9
3.2.1.... Inception, Planning & Mobilization. 9
3.2.2.... Stakeholder Engagement 9
3.2.3.... Financial Mechanisms Analysis. 9
3.2.4.... Sustainable Livelihoods Concepts. 10
3.2.5.... Support to MOFR, MECDM and MMERE. 11
3.2.6.... Analysis of Biodiversity Offsets Progress and Assignment Hold Point 11
3.2.7.... Plan of Management and M&E Framework. 12
3.2.8.... M&E Framework Implementation. 13
3.3....... Part Two - Upper Tina Catchment Montane Forest Offset Actions. 14
3.3.1.... Upper Tina Catchment Montane Forest Offset Actions. 14
3.4....... Part Three - Protected Areas Declaration with Landowning Tribes. 14
3.4.1.... Stakeholder Engagement & Institutional Setup. 14
3.4.2.... Customary Boundary Consultation and Mapping. 15
3.4.3.... Biodiversity, Resource Use and Cultural Assessments. 15
3.4.4.... Projected Area Management Planning. 16
3.4.5.... Legal Declaration & Submission. 16
3.4.6.... Capacity Building & Ranger Support 16
3.4.7.... Transition to Long-Term Governance. 17
4......... List of Outputs and Schedule. 17
5......... Schedule of outputs. 18
6......... Indicative Phases of Work. 23
7......... Consultant Firm Experience and Qualifications (included in REOI) 24
7.1....... Key Experts. 24
7.1.1.... Key Personnel Qualifications and Expertise: 25
7.2....... Non-Key Experts. 26
Resources and Further Information. 26
Appendix-Maps. 27
The Government of Solomon Islands is implementing the Tina River Hydropower Development Project (TRHDP), a flagship renewable energy initiative located in Central Guadalcanal. The project is financed by a consortium of development partners, including the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank (ADB), and is executed through a public-private partnership between the Solomon Islands Government (SIG) and Tina Hydropower Limited (THL). The development includes the construction and operation of a 15MW hydropower facility on the Tina River, located approximately 20km southeast of Honiara, along with associated transmission infrastructure linking the site to the national grid.
The Project Office, housed within the Ministry of Mines, Energy and Rural Electrification (MMERE), is responsible for the overall implementation and coordination of the project. Environmental and social management oversight is carried out in collaboration with relevant government agencies and supported by an Owner’s Engineer (Stantec). Tina Hydropower Limited holds a 35-year Power Purchase Agreement with Solomon Power, the State-Owned utility.
As part of its biodiversity commitments under the TRHDP Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA 2017), Biodiversity Management Plan (BMP 2024), and international safeguard obligations (including World Bank Environmental and Social Performance Standards and ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement), the Government has committed to implementing long-term terrestrial and aquatic biodiversity offset programs. These include the establishment of formally designated Protected Areas under the Protected Areas Act 2010 in the Upper Tina Catchment.
This Terms of Reference (ToR) outlines the scope of services for a qualified biodiversity conservation consulting firm, organisation, consortium or joint venture to support the Project Office in achieving the goals of the biodiversity offset programs and compliance with the safeguards obligations, advancing the Protected Area declaration process in the Upper Tina Catchment in partnership with land owning communities. The assignment will focus on setting up and implementing biodiversity offset monitoring and management, supporting community-based conservation following the Protected Area Toolkit5 legal compliance with the Protected Area Act,, capacity building, and the establishment of governance frameworks to ensure long-term protection and stewardship of the Upper Tina Catchment beyond the Project Office’s operational period, which concludes in 2029.
2.1 Tina River Hydropower Development Project
The TRHDP is the first large utility-scale renewable energy project to be developed in the Solomon Islands. The Project is located on the central island of Guadalcanal. Physical works include:
Construction is underway and the scheme is expected to generate electricity by early 2028.
Solomon Islands Government (SIG), through the Project Office, acquired the land for the main Project site in August 2014 from five (5) customary landowning tribes. The Project Office assisted each of the tribes to establish a co-operative society under the Co-operative Societies Act to manage project related payments to the tribes. The Project Office continues to play an active role in the corporate administration of the tribal co-operatives, including financing of an independent accounting firm to act as an Administrator of the co-operative accounts, supporting the executive committee and in ensuring they are complying to the requirements of the Coop By-Laws.
The land acquisition also involved a partnership arrangement under which the perpetual estate in the Project land was returned to a joint venture company owned equally by SIG and the five (5) tribal co-operative societies known as the Tina Core Land Company Pty Ltd (TCLC). The TCLC has leased the Project land to THL through a Land lease Agreement signed on 5 December 2019.
The leased land is called the ‘Core Land’ in the Biodiversity Management Plan and forms a key part of the terrestrial biodiversity management and offsets. This Core Land area is however not part of this assignment.
2.2 Background of Upper Tina Catchment (Upper Tina Catchment) Conservation Targets
The Upper Tina Catchment, located upstream of the TRHDP dam site, spans approximately 125 km²—roughly 83% of the Tina/Ngalimbiu catchment. The Upper Tina Catchment is characterized by rugged montane terrain, high biodiversity, and undisturbed rainforest ecosystems ranging in elevation from 800 to 2,300 meters above sea level.
The catchment includes the headwaters of the Tina River and its main tributaries: Mbeambea, Vohara, and Njarimbisu Rivers. It lies within the Guadalcanal Watershed Key Biodiversity Area, recognized for its ecological significance and vertebrate endemism.
In recognition of the potential ecological impacts of the hydropower project, the Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA, 2017), Biodiversity Management Plan (BMP, 2024), and associated offset strategies—Aquatic Offset Management Strategy (AOMS) and Terrestrial Offset Management Strategy (TOMS)—have identified the Upper Tina Catchment as a priority for conservation intervention. Approximately 12,175 hectares, including land both above and below 400 meters elevation, was proposed for project biodiversity offsets and conservation protection to safeguard forest cover, riverine health and ecosystem services. Notable conservation-significant species within the Upper Tina Catchment include three flora species, two bird species, one bat species, and four aquatic macroinvertebrates. These aquatic macroinvertebrate taxa trigger the Critical Habitat designation for the upper Tina River, as defined under the World Bank Performance Standard 6 and associated Guidance Note 6. Critical Habitat areas that retain ecological integrity continue to support these trigger species. However, formal legal protection on Guadalcanal remains limited, with less than 5% of land currently protected, while logging remains the principal direct driver of forest loss and degradation.
2.3 Rationale for Consultancy Firm
The SIG, through the Project Office under the Ministry of Mines, Energy and Rural Electrification (MMERE) and in coordination with the Ministry of Environment, Climate Change, Disaster Management and Meteorology (MECDM), is leading efforts to ensure the long-term protection of the Upper Tina Catchment.
The SIG, through the Project Office in collaboration with MECDM, seeks to engage a firm to develop a program of works towards achieving biodiversity offsets for the TRHDP and the permanent protection of the upper Tina River catchment. The mechanisms will likely be a mix of legally protected areas on tribal lands under the Protected Areas Act, sites allocated for carbon credits or biodiversity credits (or other market mechanisms) and/or protected areas in accordance with traditional kastom processes. Protection must allow for conservation and offset goals whilst also permitting sustainable management and sources of income for landowning tribes. Any conservation areas would respect the customary landowners and traditional uses of the upper catchment and would be driven by the tribes themselves.
The Project Office recognises that various market and non-market conservation / protection mechanisms may be required across the landscape to achieve the various objectives of the project and landowning tribes. Multiple tribes are known to hold customary rights in the Upper Tina Catchment, at least 12 tribes have shown an interest in participating in a process of developing a Protected Area on their land. However, the number may change as more tribes are made aware of the project or due to barriers such as legacy land claims. Therefore, the implementation approach under this assignment for offsets and conservation must account for stakeholder complexity, cultural protocols, and potential land or boundary disputes. The facilitation of each tribe through the Protected Area process will take time, based on each tribe’s needs and aspirations, and so it is difficult to forecast the level of effort.
This ToR outlines the firm’s responsibilities, deliverables, and coordination requirements to ensure timely, participatory, and legally compliant conservation outcomes, aligned with SIG policy and the project’s safeguards commitments with financial partners.
The firm will report to the Project Office and will work collaboratively with the Environmental and Social Manager and Officers to achieve the outcomes of their Terms of Reference and meet the needs of the assignment. The Project Office is well-staffed with an Environmental and Social Manager, Environmental and Social Officers whose role includes landowner engagement, a GIS Officer and a Biodiversity Officer. This team is a mix of local and international expertise and very experienced in local culture and tradition, land tenure, community engagement, biodiversity and mapping. A work plan will be prepared by the consultant during the inception phase to coordinate the inputs and outputs of the assignment and how the consultant firm and Project Officer will work together.
2.4 Roles, Responsibilities and Key Stakeholders
All actions associated with protection of the upper catchment are the responsibility of the Solomon Islands Government and the Project Office. MECDM has been identified as the lead agency and MMERE and the Project Office will support with stakeholder engagement.
Land ownership in the upper catchment is customary. The land-owning groups that have had initial discussions regarding the biodiversity management plan are Bahu Garo, Uluna Sutahuri (also owners of Core Land and part of the TCLC), Chavuchave, Charana, Sarahi and Salasivo (non-core landowners). Other landowners and / or communities with interests in the area may participate in future discussions and processes, as identified by the Project Office.
The Protected Areas will be developed through participatory engagement with landowners and the wider community, with facilitation and technical input from the firm and Project Office.
A full list of stakeholders is included in the Biodiversity Management Plan Appendix P-2-5, but key organizations include:
Consultations with potential landowners and those with an interest in the upper catchment have been undertaken since 2023. Feedback received during consultations concludes:
It is important to note that ongoing conservation efforts are being led by FAO as part of their Sustainable Forest Management Program. A consultancy retained by the program, Ecological Solution Foundation (ESF), has progressed consultations with customary owners and has commenced participatory boundary surveys on behalf of interested landowning groups in the upper catchment. The consultant will need to take this work into account and integrate it into the broader Upper Tina Catchment Plan of Management.
During this assignment the firm will be expected to support the Project Office to identify additional stakeholders that are relevant to development of Protected Areas, such as environmental NGOs, government departments and local and global non-governmental organizations.
3.1 Overview
Part One– Preparatory Analysis, Plan of Management and Stakeholder Engagement
Support to Project Office to manage Upper Tina Catchment protection and achieve project offset and conservation objectives.
Inception, planning and mobilization.
Part Two Upper Tina Catchment Montane Forest Offset Actions
Part Three–Protected Area Declarations with Landowning Tribes
Support Project Office with the facilitation and engagement with landowning tribes and facilitate at least four landowning tribes to develop their Protected Area Management Plans (PAMP) and achieve Protected Area Declarations through the Protected Areas Act 2010 process.
3.2 Part One Preparatory Analysis, Plan of Management and Stakeholder Engagement
3.2.1 Inception, Planning & Mobilization
3.2.2 Stakeholder Engagement
As part of the development and implementation of the BMP and associated offset strategies, the Project Office has prepared a BMP Consultation and Engagement Strategy (Annex P-2-5). The purpose of this document is to scope and commence the consultation needed to facilitate the development and implementation of the BMP, AOMS and TOMS, acknowledging that this will be an ongoing process during construction and operation of the Project. The Project Office Stakeholder Engagement Officers and Gender Focal Point has been engaging with land owning tribes and other stakeholders. The firm will work collaboratively with the Project Office, bringing additional capacity and expertise as follows:
3.2.3 Financial Mechanisms Analysis
The consultant shall prepare an analysis of potential financial and non-financial mechanisms and benefit sharing that could be used in the Upper Tina Catchment for achieving offsets and conservation of high value biodiversity.
The consultant shall consider the broad range of emerging and established market and non-market mechanisms that may be viable options for funding biodiversity offsets and habitat protection in the Upper Tina Catchment (and / or iTina) such as: carbon credits, biodiversity credits, grants, philanthropy, non-extractive alternative livelihood opportunities, payment for ecosystem services and others as appropriate. As part of the analysis the consultant shall consider the relevant country context: the environmental, land, economic and financial policies, laws, regulations and strategies, institutional strengths and weaknesses and the relevant cultural practices and norms relating to land tenure, gender roles and natural resource management. The analysis must include the implementation arrangements (pathway to implementation, capacity requirements etc.) and costs, and how these costs will be covered by income or other funding sources. The analysis will be informed by the consultant’s experience, key informant interviews and literature review of relevant case studies and research and discussions with investment funds and institutions, voluntary markets, credit issuers, NGOs and other potential sources of finance and support. Current relevant initiatives undertaken by the Government of Solomon Islands, , experience from community-led conservation initiatives in Choiseul and Makira, the Nakau Program (Plan Vivo carbon credits) and by the private sector shall also be considered.
The consultant shall prepare a report with potentially viable financial mechanisms or funding models described. A simplified comparative analysis will be presented, using a range of criteria that will be developed by the consultant, such as: inputs (financial and non-financial) and capacity required from land owners and other stakeholders, legal and policy implications, requirement for government inputs, measurement/verification/reporting requirements, income source(s), financial mechanism(s), additionality conditions (particularly relevant for funding biodiversity offsets), risks and a ranking of complexity, effectiveness, sustainability and/or other relevant measures. Aspects such as institutional strengthening, policy alignment, national or regional datasets, structure of the biodiversity protection mechanism(s) and benefit sharing arrangements should be considered in terms of barriers and enablers. It is expected that this analysis will build on published research, key informant interviews and consultant’s experience.
Recommendations on the mechanism(s) that may be best suited or feasible for conservation and offset objectives shall be provided. This will serve as the basis for each land owning tribe to consider for their PAMP and for the project to consider long term funding of any additional biodiversity offsets identified in Part Two. The report shall also note any policy or institutional barriers that may need attention to facilitate the success of market and non-market financial mechanisms in Solomon Islands.
A draft report and a jargon-free summary will be prepared and presented in a series of workshops with landowners and stakeholders. The final report will incorporate feedback.
The consultant shall prepare the technical methodology for the development of suitable funding models, including:
This work should be fully integrated with the broader BMP, TOMS, AOMS and with the other actions under Part One and Protected Area processes in Part Two and the concurrent activities associated with the iTina aquatic offset and protected area processes. There should be alignment with the aspirations of landowners and communities, alignment with quantified biodiversity offset and conservation protection outcomes and alignment of programs and key milestones.
The outputs of this task will be inputs into the participatory planning processes in Part Two.
3.2.4 Sustainable Livelihoods Concepts
Landowning tribes considering conservation protection through Protected Areas or other means are likely to be foregoing future income from mining, forestry and other extractive enterprises. In land above 400masl the implementation and compliance of legal frameworks prohibiting forestry will be strengthened by MoFR under an MOU signed 01 June 2023. The lure of legal and illegal forestry and mining can be reduced by developing alternative livelihoods (along with sustainable financial mechanisms as per the above task). Landowning tribes are interested in non-extractive, alternative livelihoods such as ecotourism and harvesting of non-timber forest products.
The consultant will explore potential options for alternative livelihoods and develop a series of concepts. These shall be based on the consultant’s prior knowledge, key informant interviews, project documentation review, research, case studies from Solomon Islands and internationally, and the aspirations of the land owners gathered through consultations. The consultant will Identify potential support partners (fair trade organizations, tourism networks, NGOs, markets, government departments);
The analysis shall include a risk assessment and likelihood of success based on contextual elements such as natural resources, traditions and value systems, market access and demand, skills and experience, capital required, income potential, benefits and risks to biodiversity etc. Risks and benefits for achieving conservation and livelihood outcomes should be explored. Potentially viable concepts shall be presented in non-technical summaries along with a simplified road map for each one. This information will be targeted at landowners and to the stakeholders who can support them. The information will be used as a key input into the Part Three participatory design of PAMP.
3.2.5 Support to MOFR, MECDM and MMERE
The consultant will support the PO to work collaboratively with MOFR and MMERE on a program of work to support their roles and responsibilities under SIG mining and forestry legislation. The consultant is expected to conduct the following:
3.2.6 Analysis of Biodiversity Offsets Progress and Assignment Hold Point
The BMP, TOMS and AOMS assume that land in the Upper Tina Catchment would be required for biodiversity offsets from land clearance and inundation by the Project. The options for aquatic habitat offsets are still being investigated by the Project Office and ADB, including a concurrent ‘like for like’ study in the iTina catchment and a concept to ‘trade up’ offsets by protecting montane forest in the Upper Tina Catchment. The Project Office requires the support of the firm to confirm and implement actions to achieve compliance with the AOMS and TOMS and, as a result, compliance with Performance Standard 6.
Based on information gathered in the tasks above and further interviews, landowner and stakeholder engagement, site visits, documentation review, secondary biodiversity data analysis[3], the consultant must assess and conclude on the following:
At the conclusion of this task the consultant shall prepare an Offsets Analysis Report with the following:
The end of this task is a hold point for the consultant’s contract. Based on feedback and approval of the Offsets Analysis Report by the Project Office, at its discretion, will 1) suspend Parts Two and Three; or 2) confirm the updated scope of work for Part Two and / or Part Three and provide authorisation to proceed.
3.2.7 Plan of Management and M&E Framework
The BMP Consultation and Communication Strategy recommended a community-led Plan of Management. This does not duplicate the BMP, TOMS or AOMS, but plans and tracks the actions and outcomes across the catchment (and iTina as necessary). The consultant will determine the final content and structure of the Plan of Management based on the outcome from Task 0 and in partnership with stakeholders, The content expected to include the following:
The consultant shall develop and implement a simple, cost-efficient M&E Framework that provides a regular assessment of progress towards the offset and conservation goals. It must be complimentary, and not duplicate, other monitoring and data collection in the catchment. It must take into account indigenous knowledge as well as scientific methods to provide a holistic account of catchment health and values, and progress against targets.
The specific tasks are:
Once this Plan of Management is approved by the Project Office, the consultant shall be responsible for M&E implementation (see task below).
3.2.8 M&E Framework Implementation
Biodiversity Field Work
The consultant is required to implement the field work component of the M&E Framework monitoring program. For the purposes of budgeting the consultant shall assume at least two rounds of field work is required to collect qualitative and quantitative data on forest and river habitats and key species, approximately six months apart (to capture at least one dry season and one wet season). The first round will be considered a baseline. The field work will involve working with Project Office staff and people from the landowning tribes contributing indigenous knowledge and provide support for site access and other logistics. Monitoring sites will be selected based on safe access, repeatability. habitat representativeness and ground truthing of land cover mapping and analysis (see below). Biodiversity surveys are expected to be targeted to enable mapping of habitat types, quality of habitat and provide information to enable analysis of change over time compared to the baseline and progress towards the quantitative and qualitative targets and compliance with World Bank Performance Standard 6.
Other details, such as key wildlife species to monitor, technology, methods etc., will be developed by the consultant.
Land cover mapping and analysis
The consultant shall complete at least two rounds of land cover mapping and data analysis and presentation. The consultant shall organize remote imaging of the land cover for the entire upper catchment land area (upstream of the Tina River Dam) at a resolution and quality that allows analysis and mapping of habitat type and, when replicated over time, can track land cover change. The consultant shall provide a methodology for collecting, analyzing and presenting the data, including any ground truthing required to calibrate the data, the timing/frequency, data specifications and reporting template. The methodology should be cost efficient and replicable for the duration of the PPA period.
Reporting
The consultant shall prepare at least two M&E reports during the assignment to reflect the monitoring actions above and any other data gathering and analysis required in the first 6 and 12 months of M&E Framework Implementation. The report shall provide recommendations (if any) for the updates to the Plan of Management, M&E Framework and offset strategies and actions as a result of data analysis.
Terms of Reference
Following the completion of this Task the consultant shall prepare a Terms of Reference for the Project Office to engage a third party for ongoing data collection, analysis and reporting for the M&E Framework.
3.3 Part Two - Upper Tina Catchment Montane Forest Offset Actions
3.3.1 Upper Tina Catchment Montane Forest Offset Actions
As an output in Task 0, the consultant will be required to prepare a detailed scope of work and budget to implement the ‘trading up’ offset actions to protect montane forest. Actions must be additional to those in Part One and Part Three of this assignment and any concurrent assignment in the iTina or Core Land for the purposes of achieving compliance with the AOMS and TOMS.
For the purposes of the consultant’s proposal, a nominal value of $US80,000 will be assigned to this Task. It is possible that after approving the Offsets Analysis Report, the Project Office will conclude that this Task is not necessary.
3.4 Part Three - Protected Areas Declaration with Landowning Tribes
The Firm is responsible for supporting the Project Office to engage with land owners and prepare suitable supporting information for applications to MECCDMM for declaration of Protected Areas in accordance with the Protected Areas Act 2010 and the twelve step process in the Toolkit. Many of the 12 landowning tribes in the Upper Tina Catchment have already shown an interest in Protected Areas for their land; all are at various stages of readiness and willingness. Other landowning tribes in the iTina are currently working with a consulting firm to develop Protected Areas. While broad awareness raising and engagement will continue with all interested landowning tribes, for the purposes of this assignment the firm shall assume that they will facilitate at least four[4] landowning tribes through the full Protected Area Declaration process and the handover process by the end of the assignment.
The following is the proposed scope of work based on the twelve steps in the Protected Area Toolkit[5] (Appendix B). The scope of work will be reconfirmed at the end of Task 0.
The work plan prepared under Task 0 in Part One (and updated quarterly) will include the roles and responsibilities of the Project Office staff for each of the tasks.
3.4.1 Stakeholder Engagement & Institutional Setup
3.4.2 Customary Boundary Consultation and Mapping
For at least four land owning tribes:
3.4.3 Biodiversity, Resource Use and Cultural Assessments
For at least four Protected Area Management Plan processes:
3.4.4 Projected Area Management Planning
For at least four Protected Area Management Plans:
3.4.5 Legal Declaration & Submission
For at least four Protected Area Applications:
3.4.6 Capacity Building & Ranger Support
For at least four Protected Areas:
3.4.7 Transition to Long-Term Governance
For at least four Protected Areas:
4 List of Outputs and Schedule
The initial contract period will be 23 months (until February 2028. There is a hold point at Month 9, at the end of Part One Task 6 (3.2.6 section of this ToR). Following this hold point the Project Office will provide instruction to the client to proceed based on the updated work plan or not to proceed with Part Two and / or some aspects of Part Three.
The consultant will work collegially and in an integrated manner with the Project Office. In its role, the consultant will provide timely expertise and advice to the Project Office relating to any aspect of the assignment as required. In relation to the tasks above, the consultant is expected to:
It is anticipated that the team members will conduct regular visits to Honiara including the Project Office and the at the Upper Tina Catchment area per 23-month period, aligned with key milestones and tasks such as stakeholder consultations, boundary demarcation, biodiversity surveys, and Protected Area application reviews. The consultant shall articulate their program of in-country and home office work for key personnel in their proposal and in their work plan during the assignment.
5 Schedule of outputs
Part | # | Activity | Notes | Timeline (Months from Contract Signing) | Expected Outputs |
Part 1 Preparatory Analysis | 1 | Inception, Planning and Mobilization | Contract Finalization, Initial Meetings, Site Visit and Stakeholder meetings. Stakeholder Mapping & Risk Assessment, Identification of tribal groups, legacy claims, and coordination risks. Includes briefings with Project Office, MECDM, and review of BMP, AOMS, Protected Area Toolkit. | 3 | Inception Report |
2 | Stakeholder Engagement Support | Implementation of the BMP consultation and communication strategy, Technical and capacity building support. | Various from month 4 - 23 | Various as agreed in the work plan and quarterly updates: - Workshop Materials (PPTs, Handouts) Communication materials, posts | |
3 | Financial Mechanisms Analysis | consultant’s experience, key informant interviews and literature review of relevant case studies and research and discussions with investment funds and institutions, voluntary markets, credit issuers, NGOs and other potential sources of finance and support | 7 Draft 8 Final | Draft and Final Financial Mechanisms Report | |
4 | Sustainable Livelihoods Concepts | Consultant’s prior knowledge, key informant interviews, project documentation review, research, case studies from Solomon Islands, Pacific Islands and further afield, and the aspirations of the land owners gathered through consultations | 7 Draft 8 Final | Draft and Final Sustainable Livelihoods Concepts | |
5 | Support to MOFR and MMERE | Capacity needs assessment and capacity building activities. | 8 Draft 9 Final | Draft and Final Capacity Building Plan | |
6 | Analysis of Biodiversity Offsets Progress and Relevance of Upper Tina Catchment | Interviews, site visits, documentation review, data gathering and analysis. Biodiversity offset targets and additional actions required to achieve targets. Detailed work plan and budget allocation for Part 2 and remainder of Part 3. | 8 Draft 9 Final |
Draft and Final Biodiversity Analysis Report Detailed Work Plan | |
7 | Plan of Management and M&E Framework | Prepare and consult with stakeholders, align M&E Framework with Project | 10 Draft 10 Final |
Draft and Final Plan of Management Report | |
8 | M&E Framework Implementation | Biodiversity field work. Remote sensing data collected, analyzed and presented in GIS and tabular form, noting the results of key indicators and noting any changes. | 16 22
22 | 2 x Land Cover Maps and Monitoring Data Analysis Reports.
TOR for ongoing mapping and analysis. | |
Part 2 | 9 | Upper Tina Catchment Montane Forest Offset Actions | TBC based on outputs from Task No. 6 above. | TBC | TBC |
Part 3 Protected Areas Declaration
| 10 | Community Engagement | Awareness Workshops with at least 12 Tribes Detailed engagement and participatory planning with up to four tribes
| Various 5-9 10 - 23 | Prior to Hold Point: Various as agreed in Inception Report. Following Hold Point: Various as agreed in Biodiversity Analysis Report and Updated Work Plan.
Mapping, meeting records, design outputs
|
11 | Customary Boundary Mapping | Participatory Mapping & GPS Ground-Truthing. Ground truthing of customary land boundaries and resolve overlaps; GIS Maps | –5-9
10-21 | Prior to Hold Point: As agreed in Inception Report. Following Hold Point: As agreed in Biodiversity Analysis Report and Updated Work Plan.
GIS Shapefiles and Maps of Tribal Boundaries -Verified mapping sheets per tribe | |
12 | Biodiversity, Resource Use and Cultural Assessments | Field surveys Integration of indigenous knowledge | 10 - 16 | - Survey Methodology and Protocols Indigenous knowledge methodologies Interview reports | |
13 | Protected Area Management Planning | Includes zones, rules, monitoring plan per tribe, aligned with Protected Area Toolkit 2012. Includes budgets, financial mechanisms, alternative livelihoods and safeguards. Validation with each PAMC and community endorsement along with preparation for MECDM application - Validation Workshop Reports - Tribal Approval Letters | 10 - 20 | Concept, Draft and Final Protected Area Management Plans (at least 4) - Draft PAMPs (Management Goals, Zoning, SOPs) - Preliminary Budgeting for Protected Area Implementation - Monitoring Plan Template | |
14 | Legal Declaration and Submission | Submit per tribe in phased manner according to Per Protected Area Toolkit 2012 submission process Support MECDM Review & Public Notification Facilitate MECDM Verification Site Visits Receive Protected Area Declarations For at least four tribes. | –18-21 | Protected Area Application Dossiers - Formal Application Packages per Tribe (per Protected Area Toolkit 2012) -- Draft and Published Public Notices - Public Comment and GRM Logs
| |
15 | Capacity Building and Ranger Support | Training in ecological monitoring, SOPs, compliance, enforcement, conflict management. | 20-23 | Capacity building plans - Training Materials and Modules - Ranger SOPs and Code of Conduct | |
16 | Transition to Longer Term Governance | Support to Seconded Officer from MECDM | 21-23 | Hand over packages+ - Knowledge Transfer Log - Capacity Assessment of MECDM Officers and capacity building plan | |
Project Management |
| Project Management and Reporting | Quarterly Progress Reports summarizing field activities, tribal engagement outcomes, mapping and documentation status, lessons learned and updated work plans and programmes for the next six months. Any variations to level of effort and adjustment of budget between tasks will presented for Project Office approval at this time. Work plans may be varied within the overall budget envelope of each Part. | Quarterly | Quarterly Progress Reports |
| Mid term reporting evaluating progress to date compared to original work plan and budget. Identification of risks to completion and key changes to work plan and allocation of budget to complete the assignment, for approval by Project Office. Work plans may be varied within the overall budget envelope of each Part | 13 | Mid Term Report | ||
| Final reporting including collation of key information for handover to Project Office and government | 23 | Final Completion Report - Final Technical Report (Results vs Objectives)
Handover package Includes GIS, data, legal files, SOPs Package (Protected Area Files, Maps, Data) - Tribal Engagement Logbook |
6 Indicative Phases of Work
Month Task | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
Part 1 1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part 1 2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part 1 3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part 1 4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part 1 5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part 1 6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part 1 7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part 1 8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part 2 9) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part 2 10) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part 2 11) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part 2 12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part 2 13) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part 2 14) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part 2 15) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part 3 16) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key:
| Hold point at the end of Task 0, Month 9 |
|
|
| Scope to be confirmed by the Project Office after the hold point |
|
|
The Firm shall submit to the Project Office, the expected outputs listed in the table on the dates as agreed in the Work Plan. Key deliverables will be reviewed by the Project Office and financial partners and feedback will be incorporated into the final versions.
The firm shall submit invoices as agreed in the contract, accompanied by utilization reports. firm shall submit a final report consisting of a narrative report and financial report (“Final Report”) within 30 days following the completion of the Services. The Final Report must be sufficiently detailed to allow certification of deliverables and of expenditures. The financial report shall be signed and certified as to its correctness by a duly designated representative of the PAD Firm (e.g. executive officer, chief financial officer, chief accountant or similar).
The Firm shall keep accurate financial records and maintain supporting documentation showing the utilization of inputs and funds under this Agreement and any other documentation related to the Services for a period of five years following termination or expiry of the Agreement, during which period Project Office, or a person designated by Project Office, or the relevant auditing authority (e.g. national audit office) shall have the right, at any time, to conduct reviews and/or audits relating to any aspect of this Agreement. The Firm shall provide its full and timely cooperation with any such review or audit. Full and timely cooperation shall include, but not be limited to, making available employees or agents and granting to Project Office or other designated person or relevant authority, access at reasonable times and conditions to the Firm’s premises or other sites where documentation related to this Agreement is kept or activities related to this Agreement are carried out.
7. Consultant Firm Experience and Qualifications (included in REOI)
The firm must be a legally registered entity or consortium with a proven track record in implementing protected area programs, biodiversity conservation initiatives, or natural resource management projects in community and customary land contexts. It is expected that the entity / consortium will bring local (Solomon Islands) expertise in community conservation management, biodiversity, policy, law and community engagement and bring international expertise in financial mechanisms, biodiversity offset planning and management, conservation M&E and participatory methods for community-led conservation and livelihood development. Local expertise will be essential for much of the field work and community engagement support to the PO and landowning tribes.
The firm should demonstrate at least seven (7) years of relevant experience, including the successful execution of assignments involving participatory land mapping, tribal governance strengthening, and the development of Protected Area management plans. Familiarity with both national legal frameworks and international safeguard standards—such as the International Finance Corporation (IFC) Performance Standards, World Bank Environmental and Social Performance Standards, and ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement or similar—is required.
The consulting firm / consortium must have experience in coordinating multi-stakeholder consultation processes, particularly with indigenous and customary landowners, government agencies, and conservation NGOs for natural resource management, sustainable forestry and / or conservation purposes. Experience working in Melanesian countries and Solomon Islands, is necessary for the local positions and strongly preferred for the international positions. However, comparable expertise and experience in similar ecological and cultural environments will also be considered. The firm should demonstrate capacity to manage field-based logistics, culturally sensitive engagement, and potential risks related to land tenure and boundary disputes.
7.1 Key Experts
Key Experts and expected inputs (firm to provide these details). The maximum person months is (55) in any combination of Key Experts as shown in SECTION 7, Terms of Reference Part 7.1.1 and it is up to the consulting firm to consider appropriate deployment scenarios to ensure timely submission of the contract deliverables. The Consultant to determine best number of months and split between Home Office and in-country Work.
All key team members must be fluent in English, with demonstrated ability to clearly communicate technical content to diverse audiences, including customary landowners and tribal representatives.
7.1.1 Key Personnel Qualifications and Expertise:
Level of effort: six (6) working-months (home office and project-based)
Level of effort: six (6) working-months in country.
Level of effort: three (3) working months (home office with 1-2 in-country visits)
Level of effort: six (6) working-months (home office and project-based)
Level of effort: four (4) working-months (home office and project-based)
Level of effort: six (6) working-months (home office and project-based)
Level of effort: three (3) working-months (home office and project-based)
Level of effort: three (3) working-months (home office and project-based)
All key team members must be fluent in English, with demonstrated ability to clearly communicate technical content to diverse audiences, including customary landowners and tribal representatives. Working knowledge of Solomon Islands Pidjin or experience working through Pidjin-speaking facilitators will be considered an asset. Key team members’ CVs will be evaluated in the proposal.
7.2 Non-Key Experts
Other non-key personnel are at the discretion of the firm and may include local personnel to assist with engagement and biodiversity field work, expertise in cultural heritage, financial instruments, grant fund applications, carbon credits, monitoring reporting and verification programs, M&E programs, remote sensing, forest-based livelihoods, tourism etc. Additional desirable expertise include previous experience supporting biodiversity offset implementation and Protected Area application processes in the Solomon Islands and demonstrated understanding of donor-funded project requirements related to biodiversity offsets, ecosystem services, or long-term conservation financing. Experience with community-based natural resource governance and mechanisms for co-management between state and customary institutions is essential. CVs of Non-key experts will not be considered in the evaluation process .
Resources and Further Information
Project website: https://tina-hydro.com/
Project Environmental and Social Management Plans, including the Biodiversity Management Plan (which contains the Terrestrial and Aquatic Offset Management Strategies): https://tina-hydro.com/project-esmps/
Appendix-Maps
Habitat Typology Maps for Project Area and Tina River Catchment.
Terrestrial Habitat Categorisation Maps for Project Area and Tina River Catchment (World Bank / IFC definitions of Modified, Natural and Critical Habitat)
Aquatic Habitat Categorisation Maps for Project Area and Tina River Catchment (World Bank / IFC definitions of Modified, Natural and Critical Habitat)
Map of Upper Tina River Catchment
Summary of the steps to prepare an application:
[2] Alternative income from non-extractive enterprises for land owning units to deter the lure of mining and legal or illegal forestry and / or to fund conservation activities.
[3] Detailed quantitative biodiversity field work is not anticipated at this time but observational visits will be necessary by biodiversity specialists. The consultant will review biodiversity data collected by the Project, FAO and other studies.
[4] The Project Office have a goal to achieve more than four, but the consultant is expected to provide support to at least four under this assignment.
[5] https://library.sprep.org/sites/default/files/protected-areas-toolkit.pdf
[6] For the purposes of this assignment the consultant shall assume consultations will continue with up to six tribes (those identified as most willing/ready).
[7] Formalized ranger training and certification is provided by the Solomon Islands Ranger Association, but depending on the capacity of the association and the needs of the specific PAMP, the consultant will provide on-the-ground support to the rangers to supplement or gap-fill any required upskilling or knowledge transfer.