The purpose of this consultation, which is to provide cleanliness services on the public space of orléans Métropole and the city of Orléans, is part of a "Orléans Métropole" consortium, coordinator, and the city. Orleans. It will result in the conclusion of 8 framework agreements with purchase orders, single-beneficiary, with minimum amount and no maximum, renewable. This consultation follows a previous consultation (M18s0156) declared without action for reasons of public interest (Boamp Announcement 18-180065 - announcement JOUE 2018 / s233-532633).
Underweights of the "Technical value assessed against the content of the technical memorandum and its possible annexes (Note on 10 - 30% weighting)":
- quality and coherence of the proposed methodology for the realization of the 2 fictitious sites (Note on 10 points - 20%),
- quality and consistency of the material and human resources made available by the candidate for the performance of services (Note on 10 points - 10%: material resources 5%, human resources 5%).
Underweights of the "Technical value assessed against the content of the technical memorandum and its possible annexes (Note on 10 - 30% weighting)":
- the quality and coherence of the material resources made available by the candidate for the performance of the services (Note on 10 points - 5%),
- the quality and coherence of the human resources made available by the candidate for the performance of the services (Note on 10 points - 5%),
- the quality of the methodology envisaged for the performance of the services with regard to the elements contributed to the 3 points specified in the technical memorandum framework (score on 10 points - 20%).
Underweights of the "Technical value assessed against the content of the technical memorandum and its possible annexes (Note on 10 - 30% weighting)":
- the quality and coherence of the material resources made available by the candidate for the performance of the services (Note on 10 points - 5%),
- the quality and coherence of the human resources made available by the candidate for the performance of the services (Note on 10 points - 5%),
- the quality of the methodology envisaged for the performance of the services with regard to the elements contributed to the 3 points specified in the technical memorandum framework (score on 10 points - 20%).
Underweights of the "Technical value assessed against the content of the technical memorandum and its possible annexes (Note on 10 - 30% weighting)":
- the quality and coherence of the material resources made available by the candidate for the performance of the services (Note on 10 points - 5%),
- the quality and coherence of the human resources made available by the candidate for the performance of the services (Note on 10 points - 5%),
- the quality of the methodology envisaged for the performance of the services with regard to the elements contributed to the 3 points specified in the technical memorandum framework (score on 10 points - 20%).
Underweights of the "Technical value assessed against the content of the technical memorandum and its possible annexes (Note on 10 - 30% weighting)":
- the quality and coherence of the material resources made available by the candidate for the performance of the services (Note on 10 points - 5%),
- the quality and coherence of the human resources made available by the candidate for the performance of the services (Note on 10 points - 5%),
- the quality of the methodology envisaged for the performance of the services with regard to the elements contributed to the 3 points specified in the technical memorandum framework (score on 10 points - 20%).
Under-weighting of the criterion "Technical value assessed with regard to the content of the technical memorandum and its possible annexes (Note on 10 - weighting 30%)":
- the quality and coherence of the material resources made available by the candidate for the performance of the services (Note on 10 points - 5%),
- the quality and coherence of the human resources made available by the candidate for the performance of the services (Note on 10 points - 5%),
- the quality of the methodology envisaged for the performance of the services with regard to the elements contributed to the 3 points specified in the technical memorandum framework (score on 10 points - 20%).
Underweights of the "Technical value assessed against the content of the technical memorandum and its possible annexes (Note on 10 - 30% weighting)":
- the quality and coherence of the material resources made available by the candidate for the performance of the services (Note on 10 points - 5%),
- the quality and coherence of the human resources made available by the candidate for the performance of the services (Note on 10 points - 5%),
- the quality of the methodology envisaged for the performance of the services with regard to the elements contributed to the 3 points specified in the technical memorandum framework (score on 10 points - 20%).
Underweights of the "Technical value assessed against the content of the technical memorandum and its possible annexes (Note on 10 - 30% weighting)":
- quality and coherence of the proposed methodology for the realization of the fictitious worksite (Note on 10 points - 20%),
- quality and coherence of the material and human resources made available by the candidate for the realization of services (Note on 10 points - 10%: material resources 5%, human resources 5%).