1. THE SUBJECT OF THE ORDER is the development of digital services and cybersecurity at the Provincial Multi-Specialist Hospital named after Dr. Roman Ostrzycki in Konin. The subject of the order includes 3 packages/parts: - Package No. 1 - Expansion of the HIS system and supply of IT infrastructure; - Package No. 2 - Supply of workstations; - Package No. 3 - Supply of EDR/XDR system. The subject of the order is described in detail in Annex No. 1 to the SWZ - Bid Form, Annex No. 2 to the SWZ - Description of the Subject of the Order, and in Annex No. 5 to the SWZ - Draft Provisions of the Agreement, which include the quantity of the subject of the order and the description of the subject of the order for each part of the order. 2. The Ordering Party allows the possibility of submitting partial bids. The subject of the order has been divided into 3 parts (packages). 3. The subject of the order will be delivered at the expense, risk, and transport of the Contractor. 4. The terms of execution of the Subject of the Order are also included in the Draft Provisions of the Agreement, which constitute Annex No. 5 to the SWZ. 5. The minimum guaranteed level of the value of orders to which the Ordering Party will commit is: 100% of the contract value. 6. The Ordering Party does not foresee orders referred to in Article 214, section 1, points 7 and 8 of the PZP Act. 7. The Ordering Party does not foresee exercising the option right referred to in Article 441 of the PZP Act. 8. The Ordering Party does not allow for the submission of variant offers. 9. If, in the description of the subject of the order, trademark indications, patents, or origin, source, or special process characterizing products or services delivered by a specific contractor are used, it should be understood that each such indication is accompanied by the expression “or equivalent.” 10. By “or equivalent,” the Ordering Party understands offering materials that guarantee the execution of the task in accordance with the Ordering Party's requirements and ensuring that the technical parameters are no worse than those assumed in the SWZ. The application of equivalent solutions may not lead to deterioration of the properties of the subject of the order compared to those stipulated in the original documentation, nor to a change in price, nor to a violation of legal regulations. 11. Any names of products or manufacturers included in the description of the subject of the order were used only for illustrative purposes, i.e., to approximate the requirements that could not be described using sufficiently precise and understandable definitions. Any indicated names of products and their manufacturers do not aim to violate the principle of fair competition and equal treatment of contractors. Wherever they are indicated, it should be read that the term “or equivalent” accompanies them. 12. The Ordering Party allows for the delivery of equivalent products or equipment in relation to the description of the subject of the order, meaning that the offered subject of the order will have the same or higher technical, quality, functional, and usability parameters as those indicated in the description of the subject of the order. 13. The Ordering Party will verify bids containing equivalent solutions for compliance with the requirements of individual technical requirements positions contained in the Description of the Subject of the Order (OPZ). The OPZ specifies equivalence criteria through minimal technical, functional, and quality parameters and includes separate, detailed descriptions of equivalence for selected positions, forming a closed catalog of requirements for equivalent solutions. The Contractor is obliged to prove in the bid the equivalence of the offered assortment, within the limits and in relation to the parameters specified by the Ordering Party in the OPZ. The burden of proving equivalence is the responsibility of the Contractor. The Ordering Party will not recognize equivalent solutions if they do not meet all minimal technical, functional, and quality parameters indicated for a specific position in the OPZ. In the case of requirements described using norms, technical specifications, or certificates, the Ordering Party also allows equivalent norms, documents, and certificates confirming compliance with the requirements at least at the level specified in the procurement documentation. 14. According to Article 101, section 5 of the PZP Act: if the OPZ refers to norms, technical assessments, technical specifications, and technical reference systems mentioned in Article 101, section 1, point 2 and section 3 of the PZP Act, the ordering party cannot reject an offer just because the proposed construction works, deliveries, or services do not comply with norms, technical assessments, technical specifications, and technical reference systems referred to in the description of the subject of the order, provided that the contractor proves in the offer, particularly by means of the items of evidence referred to in Articles 104-107 of the PZP Act, that the proposed solutions meet the requirements specified in the description of the subject of the order to an equivalent extent. 15. According to Article 101, section 6 of the PZP Act: if the description of the subject of the order refers to requirements concerning performance or functionality, mentioned in Article 101, section 1, point 1 of the PZP Act, the ordering party cannot reject the offer compliant with the Polish Standard transferring the European standard, standards of other member states of the European Economic Area transferring European standards, with European technical assessment, with common technical specifications, with international standards, or with the technical reference system established by a European standardization body if these norms, technical assessments, specifications, and technical reference systems relate to the performance or functionality requirements specified by the ordering party, provided that the contractor proves in the offer compliance with the Ordering Party's requirements.

LOT-0001
Part No: 1
Package No 1 - Expansion of the HIS system and supply of IT infrastructure.
1. THE SUBJECT OF THE ORDER is the expansion of the HIS system and supply of IT infrastructure. 2. The subject of the order is described in detail in Annex No. 1 to the SWZ - Bid Form, Annex No. 2 to the SWZ - Description of the Subject of the Order, and in Annex No. 5 to the SWZ - Draft Provisions of the Agreement, which include the quantity of the subject of the order and the description of the subject of the order for each part of the order. 3. The subject of the order will be delivered at the expense, risk, and transport of the Contractor. 4. The terms of execution of the Subject of the Order are also included in the Draft Provisions of the Agreement, which constitute Annex No. 5 to the SWZ. 5. The minimum guaranteed level of the value of orders to which the Ordering Party will commit is: 100% of the contract value. 6. The Ordering Party does not foresee orders referred to in Article 214, section 1, points 7 and 8 of the PZP Act. 7. The Ordering Party does not foresee exercising the option right referred to in Article 441 of the PZP Act. 8. The Ordering Party does not allow for the submission of variant offers. 9. If, in the description of the subject of the order, trademark indications, patents, or origin, source, or special process characterizing products or services delivered by a specific contractor are used, it should be understood that each such indication is accompanied by the expression “or equivalent.” 10. By “or equivalent,” the Ordering Party understands offering materials that guarantee the execution of the task in accordance with the Ordering Party's requirements and ensuring that the technical parameters are no worse than those assumed in the SWZ. The application of equivalent solutions may not lead to deterioration of the properties of the subject of the order compared to those stipulated in the original documentation, nor to a change in price, nor to a violation of legal regulations. 11. Any names of products or manufacturers included in the description of the subject of the order were used only for illustrative purposes, i.e., to approximate the requirements that could not be described using sufficiently precise and understandable definitions. Any indicated names of products and their manufacturers do not aim to violate the principle of fair competition and equal treatment of contractors. Wherever they are indicated, it should be read that the term “or equivalent” accompanies them. 12. The Ordering Party allows for the delivery of equivalent products or equipment in relation to the description of the subject of the order, meaning that the offered subject of the order will have the same or higher technical, quality, functional, and usability parameters as those indicated in the description of the subject of the order. 13. The Ordering Party will verify bids containing equivalent solutions for compliance with the requirements of individual technical requirements positions contained in the Description of the Subject of the Order (OPZ). The OPZ specifies equivalence criteria through minimal technical, functional, and quality parameters and includes separate, detailed descriptions of equivalence for selected positions, forming a closed catalog of requirements for equivalent solutions. The Contractor is obliged to prove in the bid the equivalence of the offered assortment, within the limits and in relation to the parameters specified by the Ordering Party in the OPZ. The burden of proving equivalence is the responsibility of the Contractor. The Ordering Party will not recognize equivalent solutions if they do not meet all minimal technical, functional, and quality parameters indicated for a specific position in the OPZ. In the case of requirements described using norms, technical specifications, or certificates, the Ordering Party also allows equivalent norms, documents, and certificates confirming compliance with the requirements at least at the level specified in the procurement documentation. 14. According to Article 101, section 5 of the PZP Act: if the OPZ refers to norms, technical assessments, technical specifications, and technical reference systems mentioned in Article 101, section 1, point 2 and section 3 of the PZP Act, the ordering party cannot reject an offer just because the proposed construction works, deliveries, or services do not comply with norms, technical assessments, technical specifications, and technical reference systems referred to in the description of the subject of the order, provided that the contractor proves in the offer, particularly by means of the items of evidence referred to in Articles 104-107 of the PZP Act, that the proposed solutions meet the requirements specified in the description of the subject of the order to an equivalent extent. 15. According to Article 101, section 6 of the PZP Act: if the description of the subject of the order refers to requirements concerning performance or functionality, mentioned in Article 101, section 1, point 1 of the PZP Act, the ordering party cannot reject the offer compliant with the Polish Standard transferring the European standard, standards of other member states of the European Economic Area transferring European standards, with European technical assessment, with common technical specifications, with international standards, or with the technical reference system established by a European standardization body if these norms, technical assessments, specifications, and technical reference systems relate to the performance or functionality requirements specified by the ordering party, provided that the contractor proves in the offer compliance with the Ordering Party's requirements. The Ordering Party will make the SWZ along with annexes available on the website of the ongoing proceedings: https://www.platformazakupowa.pl/transakcja/1214881

LOT-0002
Part No: 2
Package No 2 - Supply of workstations.
1. THE SUBJECT OF THE ORDER is the delivery of workstations.
2. The subject of the order has been detailed in Annex 1 to the Terms of Reference - Offer Form, Annex 2 to the Terms of Reference - Description of the subject of the order, and in Annex 5 to the Terms of Reference - Draft Provisions of the Agreement, which specify the quantity of the subject of the order and description of the subject for each part of the order.
3. The subject of the order will be delivered at the expense, risk, and transportation of the Contractor.
4. Conditions for the execution of the Subject of the Order are also included in the Draft Provisions of the Agreement, which constitute Annex 5 to the Terms of Reference.
5. The minimum guaranteed level of order values, to which the Ordering Party undertakes, is: 100% of the contract value.
6. The Ordering Party does not foresee orders mentioned in Article 214 paragraph 1 points 7 and 8 of the PZP law.
7. The Ordering Party does not foresee exercising the right of option referred to in Article 441 of the PZP law.
8. The Ordering Party does not allow the submission of variant offers.
9. In cases where the description of the subject of the order uses the indication of trademarks, patents, or origin, source, or a specific process characterizing products or services provided by a specific contractor, it should be understood that each such indication is accompanied by the expression "or equivalent".
10. By the term "or equivalent," the Ordering Party understands the offering of materials guaranteeing the execution of the task in accordance with the requirements of the Ordering Party and ensuring the achievement of technical parameters no worse than those assumed in the Terms of Reference. The use of equivalent solutions may not lead to deterioration of the properties of the subject of the order compared to those provided in the original documentation, nor to price changes, nor to violations of legal regulations.
11. Any product or manufacturer names included in the description of the subject of the order were used merely for illustrative purposes, that is, to approximate the requirements that could not be described using sufficiently precise and understandable definitions. The indicated product names and their manufacturers do not aim to violate the principle of fair competition and equal treatment of contractors. Wherever they are indicated, it should be read that they are accompanied by the term "or equivalent".
12. The Ordering Party allows the delivery of equivalent products or equipment in relation to the description of the subject of the order, i.e., that the offered subject of the order will have the same or higher technical, quality, functional, and usability parameters as those indicated in the description of the subject of the order.
13. In the case of offers containing equivalent solutions, the Ordering Party will verify them in terms of meeting the requirements of individual technical requirements contained in the Description of the Subject of the Order (OPZ). The OPZ specifies the equivalence criteria through minimum technical, functional, and quality parameters, and for selected items, it contains separate, detailed descriptions of equivalence constituting a closed catalog of requirements for equivalent solutions. The Contractor is obliged to demonstrate in the offer the equivalence of the offered assortment, within the limits and in relation to the parameters specified by the Ordering Party in the OPZ. The burden of proving equivalence is the Contractor's obligation. The Ordering Party will not recognize equivalent solutions if they do not meet all the minimum technical, functional, and quality parameters specified for a given position in the OPZ.
In case the requirements are described using standards, technical specifications, or certificates, the Ordering Party also allows equivalent standards, documents, and certificates confirming compliance with at least the level specified in the order documentation.
14. According to Article 101 paragraph 5 of the PZP Law: if the OPZ refers to standards, technical assessments, technical specifications, and systems of technical references, mentioned in Article 101 paragraph 1 point 2 and paragraph 3 of the PZP Law, the Ordering Party cannot reject the offer solely because the offered construction works, deliveries, or services do not comply with the standards, technical assessments, technical specifications, and systems of technical references referenced by the description of the subject of the contract, provided that the contractor proves in the offer, particularly through the relevant means of evidence, referred to in Articles 104-107 of the PZP law, that the proposed solutions meet the requirements set out in the description of the subject of the contract to an equivalent degree.
15. According to Article 101 paragraph 6 of the PZP Law: in cases where the description of the subject of the order refers to requirements regarding performance or functionality, as referred to in Article 101 paragraph 1 point 1 of the PZP law, the Ordering Party cannot reject an offer compliant with Polish Standards transferring European standards, standards from other member states of the European Economic Area transferring European standards, with European technical assessments, with a common technical specification, with an international standard, or with a system of technical references established by a European standardization body, if these standards, technical assessments, specifications, and systems of technical references pertain to the performance or functionality requirements specified by the Ordering Party, provided that the contractor proves in the offer compliance with the requirements of the Ordering Party.
The Terms of Reference along with attachments will be made available on the website of the ongoing proceedings: https://www.platformazakupowa.pl/transakcja/1214881

LOT-0003
Part no: 3
Package no 3 - Delivery of the EDR/XDR system.
1. THE SUBJECT OF THE ORDER is the delivery of the EDR/XDR system.
2. The subject of the order has been detailed in Annex 1 to the Terms of Reference - Offer Form, Annex 2 to the Terms of Reference - Description of the subject of the order, and in Annex 5 to the Terms of Reference - Draft Provisions of the Agreement, which specify the quantity of the subject of the order and description of the subject for each part of the order.
3. The subject of the order will be delivered at the expense, risk, and transportation of the Contractor.
4. Conditions for the execution of the Subject of the Order are also included in the Draft Provisions of the Agreement, which constitute Annex 5 to the Terms of Reference.
5. The minimum guaranteed level of order values, to which the Ordering Party undertakes, is: 100% of the contract value.
6. The Ordering Party does not foresee orders mentioned in Article 214 paragraph 1 points 7 and 8 of the PZP law.
7. The Ordering Party does not foresee exercising the right of option referred to in Article 441 of the PZP law.
8. The Ordering Party does not allow the submission of variant offers.
9. In cases where the description of the subject of the order uses the indication of trademarks, patents, or origin, source, or a specific process characterizing products or services provided by a specific contractor, it should be understood that each such indication is accompanied by the expression "or equivalent".
10. By the term "or equivalent," the Ordering Party understands the offering of materials guaranteeing the execution of the task in accordance with the requirements of the Ordering Party and ensuring the achievement of technical parameters no worse than those assumed in the Terms of Reference. The use of equivalent solutions may not lead to deterioration of the properties of the subject of the order compared to those provided in the original documentation, nor to price changes, nor to violations of legal regulations.
11. Any product or manufacturer names included in the description of the subject of the order were used merely for illustrative purposes, that is, to approximate the requirements that could not be described using sufficiently precise and understandable definitions. The indicated product names and their manufacturers do not aim to violate the principle of fair competition and equal treatment of contractors. Wherever they are indicated, it should be read that they are accompanied by the term "or equivalent".
12. The Ordering Party allows the delivery of equivalent products or equipment in relation to the description of the subject of the order, i.e., that the offered subject of the order will have the same or higher technical, quality, functional, and usability parameters as those indicated in the description of the subject of the order.
13. In the case of offers containing equivalent solutions, the Ordering Party will verify them in terms of meeting the requirements of individual technical requirements contained in the Description of the Subject of the Order (OPZ). The OPZ specifies the equivalence criteria through minimum technical, functional, and quality parameters, and for selected items, it contains separate, detailed descriptions of equivalence constituting a closed catalog of requirements for equivalent solutions. The Contractor is obliged to demonstrate in the offer the equivalence of the offered assortment, within the limits and in relation to the parameters specified by the Ordering Party in the OPZ. The burden of proving equivalence is the Contractor's obligation. The Ordering Party will not recognize equivalent solutions if they do not meet all the minimum technical, functional, and quality parameters specified for a given position in the OPZ.
In case the requirements are described using standards, technical specifications, or certificates, the Ordering Party also allows equivalent standards, documents, and certificates confirming compliance with at least the level specified in the order documentation.
14. According to Article 101 paragraph 5 of the PZP Law: if the OPZ refers to standards, technical assessments, technical specifications, and systems of technical references, mentioned in Article 101 paragraph 1 point 2 and paragraph 3 of the PZP Law, the Ordering Party cannot reject the offer solely because the offered construction works, deliveries, or services do not comply with the standards, technical assessments, technical specifications, and systems of technical references referenced by the description of the subject of the contract, provided that the contractor proves in the offer, particularly through the relevant means of evidence, referred to in Articles 104-107 of the PZP law, that the proposed solutions meet the requirements set out in the description of the subject of the contract to an equivalent degree.
15. According to Article 101 paragraph 6 of the PZP Law: in cases where the description of the subject of the order refers to requirements regarding performance or functionality, as referred to in Article 101 paragraph 1 point 1 of the PZP law, the Ordering Party cannot reject an offer compliant with Polish Standards transferring European standards, standards from other member states of the European Economic Area transferring European standards, with European technical assessments, with a common technical specification, with an international standard, or with a system of technical references established by a European standardization body, if these standards, technical assessments, specifications, and systems of technical references pertain to the performance or functionality requirements specified by the Ordering Party, provided that the contractor proves in the offer compliance with the requirements of the Ordering Party.
The Terms of Reference along with attachments will be made available on the website of the ongoing proceedings: https://www.platformazakupowa.pl/transakcja/1214881