The subject is a service consisting in monitoring the conservation status of objects of protection of Natura 2000 areas in Wielkopolskie Voivodeship:

I — habitats 7210 and 7230 in the Wielkopolska part of Natura 2000 Lake Gopło area;

II — habitats 3150, 6410, 6430, 6510, 7140, 9170, 9190 and 91E0 in the Wielkopolska part of Natura 2000 Gutter of Obrzańskie Lakes;

III — habitat 6430 in the Greater Poland part of Natura 2000 Pradolina Bzury-Neru area;

IV — habitats 6120, 6410, 6510, 9110, 9170, 9190, 91D0, 91E0 and 91F0 in Natura 2000 Krotoszyńska Plate Uroczyska area;

V — habitats 3150, 6510, 7210, 9170, 91E0 and 91F0 in Natura 2000 Ostoja Zgierzyniecka area;

VI — 7220 habitats in the Greater Poland part of Natura 2000 Rurzyca Valley area;

VII — habitats 3140, 3150, 6210, 6410, 6440, 6510, 7140, 7150, 7210, 9170, 9190, 91E0, 91F0 and 91I0 in the Wielkopolska part of Natura 2000 Lake District Gnieźno Lake District;

VIII - Lichen Loesela (Liparis loeseli) and glossy sickle;

IX - narrowed pupa

Area of implementation of individual parts of the subject of the order

For Part I

Assessment of conservation status of natural habitats 7210 and 7230 designated in conservation activities No. 30 and 31 in order of Regional Director of Environmental Protection in Poznań and Regional Director of Environmental Protection in Bydgoszcz of 3 April 2014 on the establishment of a conservation task plan for Natura 2000 Lake Gopło PLH 040007 (Journal of Journal of Laws Woj. In 2014, item 2163, dated 2015 item 5673) should be performed on certain positions in Natura 2000, located in the Wielkopolska Voivodeship. The Contracting Authority will make available a vector layer of natural habitats, which will be the basis for designation of research sites (FL. 1 to OPZ).

Applicable to Part I — IX: The assessment of the conservation status should be made in accordance with the Regulation of the Minister of the Environment of 17 February 2010 on the drawing up of a draft conservation task plan for Natura 2000 (Journal of Laws No. 34, item 186 as amended). The total assessment of the conservation status of natural habitat in the area should be derived from partial assessments made at research sites.

In addition, the Contracting Authority will make available the results of previous field tests, including conservation status assessments, for Parts I — VIII after signing an agreement with the Contractor.

Applicable to Part I — IX: For each research position, the contractor will provide field observation forms described in the methodical guides developed for the State Environmental Monitoring of the PMŚ.

In the absence of a finding of the occurrence of a natural habitat/species in the locations indicated, the Contractor shall be obliged to draw up simplified field observation forms containing at least the following information:

(a) the name and code of the natural habitat/species given in earlier studies;

(b) in the case of natural habitats: the name of the real vegetation unit (name of a plant assembly or plant community, together with association belonging to the compound, possibly the name of the compound itself);

(c) the date of field tests;

(d) the position coordinates in the PL-1992 system;

(e) in the observations of the form will explain whether, in the light of available knowledge, the research site has disappearance of the previously identified natural habitat/species together with the justification of why and a proposal for measures to restore it (where possible) or at the position research research has not previously found natural habitat/species and we are dealing with an error in identification.

Applies to Part I — IX: A component component of field observation forms is a list of current impacts; the contractor will supplement this list with potential impacts. When identifying the impacts, it is necessary to take into account primarily those of the nature of threats, divided into internal and external. A factor currently adversely affecting the conservation status of natural habitat, resulting from natural causes or human activities, should be understood as potential hazards to mean a factor whose negative impact on the conservation status of the species is probable in the future, arising from natural causes or from human activity.

Applicable to Part I — VIII: Verify the information contained in the conservation task plan for conservation objectives and conservation activities for natural habitats/species — if the assessment of conservation status and identified risks is necessary. The objectives of conservation measures must be formulated to be measurable and verifiable, e.g. lowering the underline short circuit to 20%, reducing the number of invasive species X by half, etc. The objectives should be related to protective actions for their implementation, e.g. the objective: lowering the underline short circuit to 20% → protective action: cutting bushes on an area of 2.5 hectares.

Entire description of the order item in SWZ

Area of implementation of individual parts of the subject of the order

For Part II

Assessment of conservation status of natural habitats 3150, 6410, 6430, 6510, 7140, 9170, 9190 and 91E0 designated in conservation action no. C1 in order of Regional Director of Environmental Protection in Gorzów Wielkopolski and Regional Director of Environmental Protection in Poznań of 5 May 2014 on the subject establishing a conservation task plan for Natura 2000 Gutter of Obrzańskie Lakes PLH080002 (Journal of Journal of Laws Woj. In 2014, item 2885, dated 2017 item 1444) should be performed on a representative number of positions in Natura 2000, Wielkopolska Voivodeship. The Ordering Party will make available a vector layer of natural habitats, which will be the basis for designation of research sites (Part 2 to OPZ).

Applicable to Part I — IX: The assessment of the conservation status should be made in accordance with the Regulation of the Minister of the Environment of 17 February 2010 on the drawing up of a draft conservation task plan for Natura 2000 (Journal of Laws No. 34, item 186 as amended). The total assessment of the conservation status of natural habitat in the area should be derived from partial assessments made at research sites.

In addition, the Contracting Authority will make available the results of previous field tests, including conservation status assessments, for Parts I — VIII after signing an agreement with the Contractor.

Applicable to Part I — IX: For each research position, the contractor will provide field observation forms described in the methodical guides developed for the State Environmental Monitoring of the PMŚ.

In the absence of a finding of the occurrence of a natural habitat/species in the locations indicated, the Contractor shall be obliged to draw up simplified field observation forms containing at least the following information:

(a) the name and code of the natural habitat/species given in earlier studies;

(b) in the case of natural habitats: the name of the real vegetation unit (name of a plant assembly or plant community, together with association belonging to the compound, possibly the name of the compound itself);

(c) the date of field tests;

(d) the position coordinates in the PL-1992 system;

(e) in the observations of the form will explain whether, in the light of available knowledge, the research site has disappearance of the previously identified natural habitat/species together with the justification of why and a proposal for measures to restore it (where possible) or at the position research research has not previously found natural habitat/species and we are dealing with an error in identification.

Applies to Part I — IX: A component component of field observation forms is a list of current impacts; the contractor will supplement this list with potential impacts. When identifying the impacts, it is necessary to take into account primarily those of the nature of threats, divided into internal and external. A factor currently adversely affecting the conservation status of natural habitat, resulting from natural causes or human activities, should be understood as potential hazards to mean a factor whose negative impact on the conservation status of the species is probable in the future, arising from natural causes or from human activity.

Applicable to Part I — VIII: Verify the information contained in the conservation task plan for conservation objectives and conservation activities for natural habitats/species — if the assessment of conservation status and identified risks is necessary. The objectives of conservation measures must be formulated to be measurable and verifiable, e.g. lowering the underline short circuit to 20%, reducing the number of invasive species X by half, etc. The objectives should be related to protective actions for their implementation, e.g. the objective: lowering the underline short circuit to 20% → protective action: cutting bushes on an area of 2.5 hectares.

Entire description of the order item in SWZ

Area of implementation of individual parts of the subject of the order

For Part III

Assessment of the conservation status of natural habitat 6430 designated in conservation action No 3 in the order of the Regional Director of Environmental Protection in Lodz and Regional Director of Environmental Protection in Poznań of 18 March 2014 on the establishment of a conservation task plan for Natura area 2000 Pradolina Bzury-Neru PLH100006 (Journal of Urz. Woj. In 2014 item 1899, dated 2016 item 2292, dated 2018 item 5193) should be performed on certain positions in Natura 2000, located in the Wielkopolska Voivodeship. The Contracting Authority will make available a vector layer of natural habitats, which will be the basis for designation of research sites (Approx 3 to OPZ).

Applicable to Part I — IX: The assessment of the conservation status should be made in accordance with the Regulation of the Minister of the Environment of 17 February 2010 on the drawing up of a draft conservation task plan for Natura 2000 (Journal of Laws No. 34, item 186 as amended). The total assessment of the conservation status of natural habitat in the area should be derived from partial assessments made at research sites.

In addition, the Contracting Authority will make available the results of previous field tests, including conservation status assessments, for Parts I — VIII after signing an agreement with the Contractor.

Applicable to Part I — IX: For each research position, the contractor will provide field observation forms described in the methodical guides developed for the State Environmental Monitoring of the PMŚ.

In the absence of a finding of the occurrence of a natural habitat/species in the locations indicated, the Contractor shall be obliged to draw up simplified field observation forms containing at least the following information:

(a) the name and code of the natural habitat/species given in earlier studies;

(b) in the case of natural habitats: the name of the real vegetation unit (name of a plant assembly or plant community, together with association belonging to the compound, possibly the name of the compound itself);

(c) the date of field tests;

(d) the position coordinates in the PL-1992 system;

(e) in the observations of the form will explain whether, in the light of available knowledge, the research site has disappearance of the previously identified natural habitat/species together with the justification of why and a proposal for measures to restore it (where possible) or at the position research research has not previously found natural habitat/species and we are dealing with an error in identification.

Applies to Part I — IX: A component component of field observation forms is a list of current impacts; the contractor will supplement this list with potential impacts. When identifying the impacts, it is necessary to take into account primarily those of the nature of threats, divided into internal and external. A factor currently adversely affecting the conservation status of natural habitat, resulting from natural causes or human activities, should be understood as potential hazards to mean a factor whose negative impact on the conservation status of the species is probable in the future, arising from natural causes or from human activity.

Applicable to Part I — VIII: Verify the information contained in the conservation task plan for conservation objectives and conservation activities for natural habitats/species — if the assessment of conservation status and identified risks is necessary. The objectives of conservation measures must be formulated to be measurable and verifiable, e.g. lowering the underline short circuit to 20%, reducing the number of invasive species X by half, etc. The objectives should be related to protective actions for their implementation, e.g. the objective: lowering the underline short circuit to 20% → protective action: cutting bushes on an area of 2.5 hectares.

Entire description of the order item in SWZ

Area of implementation of individual parts of the subject of the order

For Part IV

The Contractor shall verify the occurrence of natural habitats 6120, 6410, 6430, 6510, 7230, 9110, 9170, 9190, 91D0, 91E0 and 91F0 in part of Natura 2000 area, the spatial range of which is specified in Annex 4 to OPZ.

In the results of the executed diagnosis, an assessment of the conservation status of natural habitats 6120, 6410, 6430, 6510, 7230, 9110, 9170, 9190, 91D0, 91E0 and 91F0 shall be carried out in accordance with conservation action No. 18 as defined in the Order of the Regional Director of Environmental Protection in Poznań dated 2 April 2014. on the establishment of a conservation task plan for Natura 2000 Uroczyska of Krotoszyńska Plate PLH300002 (Journal of Journal of Laws Woj. Wlkp. from 2014, item 2113, dated 2015 item 4775, dated 2015, item 8496)

Applicable to Part I — IX: The assessment of the conservation status should be made in accordance with the Regulation of the Minister of the Environment of 17 February 2010 on the drawing up of a draft conservation task plan for Natura 2000 (Journal of Laws No. 34, item 186 as amended). The total assessment of the conservation status of natural habitat in the area should be derived from partial assessments made at research sites.

In addition, the Contracting Authority will make available the results of previous field tests, including conservation status assessments, for Parts I — VIII after signing an agreement with the Contractor.

Applicable to Part I — IX: For each research position, the contractor will provide field observation forms described in the methodical guides developed for the State Environmental Monitoring of the PMŚ.

In the absence of a finding of the occurrence of a natural habitat/species in the locations indicated, the Contractor shall be obliged to draw up simplified field observation forms containing at least the following information:

(a) the name and code of the natural habitat/species given in earlier studies;

(b) in the case of natural habitats: the name of the real vegetation unit (name of a plant assembly or plant community, together with association belonging to the compound, possibly the name of the compound itself);

(c) the date of field tests;

(d) the position coordinates in the PL-1992 system;

(e) in the observations of the form will explain whether, in the light of available knowledge, the research site has disappearance of the previously identified natural habitat/species together with the justification of why and a proposal for measures to restore it (where possible) or at the position research research has not previously found natural habitat/species and we are dealing with an error in identification.

Applies to Part I — IX: A component component of field observation forms is a list of current impacts; the contractor will supplement this list with potential impacts. When identifying the impacts, it is necessary to take into account primarily those of the nature of threats, divided into internal and external. A factor currently adversely affecting the conservation status of natural habitat, resulting from natural causes or human activities, should be understood as potential hazards to mean a factor whose negative impact on the conservation status of the species is probable in the future, arising from natural causes or from human activity.

Applicable to Part I — VIII: Verify the information contained in the conservation task plan for conservation objectives and conservation activities for natural habitats/species — if the assessment of conservation status and identified risks is necessary. The objectives of conservation measures must be formulated to be measurable and verifiable, e.g. lowering the underline short circuit to 20%, reducing the number of invasive species X by half, etc. The objectives should be related to protective actions for their implementation, e.g. the objective: lowering the underline short circuit to 20% → protective action: cutting bushes on an area of 2.5 hectares.

Entire description of the order item in SWZ

Area of implementation of individual parts of the subject of the order

For Part V

The assessment of the conservation status of natural habitats designated in Natura 2000 Ostoja Zgierzyniecka PLH300007 should be performed for:

(a) habitats 6510 — positions defined in conservation action No 4 in the Order of the Regional Director of Environmental Protection in Poznań of 19 March 2014 on the establishment of a conservation task plan for Natura 2000 Ostoja Zgierzyniecka PLH300007 (Journal of Laws. Woj. Wlkp. from 2014 item 1818, dated 2014, item 6413)

(b) habitats 9170, 91E0 and 91F0 — positions defined in conservation action No 3 in the Regional Order of the Environmental Protection Director in Poznań of 5 March 2014 on the establishment of a conservation plan for the Great Forest Nature Reserve (Journal of Journal of Laws, Journal of Laws. Woj. Wlkp. From 2014 item 1498, dated 2015 item 3557)

Applicable to Part I — IX: The assessment of the conservation status should be made in accordance with the Regulation of the Minister of the Environment of 17 February 2010 on the drawing up of a draft conservation task plan for Natura 2000 (Journal of Laws No. 34, item 186 as amended). The total assessment of the conservation status of natural habitat in the area should be derived from partial assessments made at research sites.

In addition, the Contracting Authority will make available the results of previous field tests, including conservation status assessments, for Parts I — VIII after signing an agreement with the Contractor.

Applicable to Part I — IX: For each research position, the contractor will provide field observation forms described in the methodical guides developed for the State Environmental Monitoring of the PMŚ.

In the absence of a finding of the occurrence of a natural habitat/species in the locations indicated, the Contractor shall be obliged to draw up simplified field observation forms containing at least the following information:

(a) the name and code of the natural habitat/species given in earlier studies;

(b) in the case of natural habitats: the name of the real vegetation unit (name of a plant assembly or plant community, together with association belonging to the compound, possibly the name of the compound itself);

(c) the date of field tests;

(d) the position coordinates in the PL-1992 system;

(e) in the observations of the form will explain whether, in the light of available knowledge, the research site has disappearance of the previously identified natural habitat/species together with the justification of why and a proposal for measures to restore it (where possible) or at the position research research has not previously found natural habitat/species and we are dealing with an error in identification.

Applies to Part I — IX: A component component of field observation forms is a list of current impacts; the contractor will supplement this list with potential impacts. When identifying the impacts, it is necessary to take into account primarily those of the nature of threats, divided into internal and external. A factor currently adversely affecting the conservation status of natural habitat, resulting from natural causes or human activities, should be understood as potential hazards to mean a factor whose negative impact on the conservation status of the species is probable in the future, arising from natural causes or from human activity.

Applicable to Part I — VIII: Verify the information contained in the conservation task plan for conservation objectives and conservation activities for natural habitats/species — if the assessment of conservation status and identified risks is necessary. The objectives of conservation measures must be formulated to be measurable and verifiable, e.g. lowering the underline short circuit to 20%, reducing the number of invasive species X by half, etc. The objectives should be related to protective actions for their implementation, e.g. the objective: lowering the underline short circuit to 20% → protective action: cutting bushes on an area of 2.5 hectares.

Entire description of the order item in SWZ

Area of implementation of individual parts of the subject of the order

For Part VI

Assessment of the conservation status of natural habitat 7220 according to conservation action No. 1 in the order of Regional Director of Environmental Protection in Szczecin and Regional Director of Environmental Protection in Poznań of 30 June 2014 on the establishment of a conservation task plan for the area Nature 2000 Rus Valley PLH300017 (Journal of Urz. Woj. In 2014 item 3784, dated 2018 item 3274) should be performed on a representative number of positions in Natura 2000 area in Wielkopolska Voivodeship. The Ordering Party will make available a vector layer of natural habitats, which will be the basis for designation of research sites (Annex No. 6 to OPZ).

Applicable to Part I — IX: The assessment of the conservation status should be made in accordance with the Regulation of the Minister of the Environment of 17 February 2010 on the drawing up of a draft conservation task plan for Natura 2000 (Journal of Laws No. 34, item 186 as amended). The total assessment of the conservation status of natural habitat in the area should be derived from partial assessments made at research sites.

In addition, the Contracting Authority will make available the results of previous field tests, including conservation status assessments, for Parts I — VIII after signing an agreement with the Contractor.

Applicable to Part I — IX: For each research position, the contractor will provide field observation forms described in the methodical guides developed for the State Environmental Monitoring of the PMŚ.

In the absence of a finding of the occurrence of a natural habitat/species in the locations indicated, the Contractor shall be obliged to draw up simplified field observation forms containing at least the following information:

(a) the name and code of the natural habitat/species given in earlier studies;

(b) in the case of natural habitats: the name of the real vegetation unit (name of a plant assembly or plant community, together with association belonging to the compound, possibly the name of the compound itself);

(c) the date of field tests;

(d) the position coordinates in the PL-1992 system;

(e) in the observations of the form will explain whether, in the light of available knowledge, the research site has disappearance of the previously identified natural habitat/species together with the justification of why and a proposal for measures to restore it (where possible) or at the position research research has not previously found natural habitat/species and we are dealing with an error in identification.

Applies to Part I — IX: A component component of field observation forms is a list of current impacts; the contractor will supplement this list with potential impacts. When identifying the impacts, it is necessary to take into account primarily those of the nature of threats, divided into internal and external. A factor currently adversely affecting the conservation status of natural habitat, resulting from natural causes or human activities, should be understood as potential hazards to mean a factor whose negative impact on the conservation status of the species is probable in the future, arising from natural causes or from human activity.

Applicable to Part I — VIII: Verify the information contained in the conservation task plan for conservation objectives and conservation activities for natural habitats/species — if the assessment of conservation status and identified risks is necessary. The objectives of conservation measures must be formulated to be measurable and verifiable, e.g. lowering the underline short circuit to 20%, reducing the number of invasive species X by half, etc. The objectives should be related to protective actions for their implementation, e.g. the objective: lowering the underline short circuit to 20% → protective action: cutting bushes on an area of 2.5 hectares.

Entire description of the order item in SWZ

Area of implementation of individual parts of the subject of the order

For Part VII

Assessment of the conservation status of natural habitats 3140, 3150, 6210, 6410, 6440, 6510, 7140, 7150, 7210, 9170, 9190, 91E0, 91F0 and 91I0 designated in conservation action no. 32 in order of Regional Director of Environmental Protection in Poznań and Regional Director of Environmental Protection in Bydd hosts of the day 15 September 2015 on the establishment of a conservation task plan for Natura 2000 area of Gnieźno Lake District PLH300026 (Journal of Laws Journal of Laws Woj. In 2014, item 2383, dated 2015 item 5276) should be performed on a representative number of positions in Natura 2000 area in Wielkopolska Voivodeship. The Ordering Party will make available a vector layer of natural habitats, which will be the basis for the designation of research sites (Annex No 7 to OPZ).

Applicable to Part I — IX: The assessment of the conservation status should be made in accordance with the Regulation of the Minister of the Environment of 17 February 2010 on the drawing up of a draft conservation task plan for Natura 2000 (Journal of Laws No. 34, item 186 as amended). The total assessment of the conservation status of natural habitat in the area should be derived from partial assessments made at research sites.

In addition, the Contracting Authority will make available the results of previous field tests, including conservation status assessments, for Parts I — VIII after signing an agreement with the Contractor.

Applicable to Part I — IX: For each research position, the contractor will provide field observation forms described in the methodical guides developed for the State Environmental Monitoring of the PMŚ.

In the absence of a finding of the occurrence of a natural habitat/species in the locations indicated, the Contractor shall be obliged to draw up simplified field observation forms containing at least the following information:

(a) the name and code of the natural habitat/species given in earlier studies;

(b) in the case of natural habitats: the name of the real vegetation unit (name of a plant assembly or plant community, together with association belonging to the compound, possibly the name of the compound itself);

(c) the date of field tests;

(d) the position coordinates in the PL-1992 system;

(e) in the observations of the form will explain whether, in the light of available knowledge, the research site has disappearance of the previously identified natural habitat/species together with the justification of why and a proposal for measures to restore it (where possible) or at the position research research has not previously found natural habitat/species and we are dealing with an error in identification.

Applies to Part I — IX: A component component of field observation forms is a list of current impacts; the contractor will supplement this list with potential impacts. When identifying the impacts, it is necessary to take into account primarily those of the nature of threats, divided into internal and external. A factor currently adversely affecting the conservation status of natural habitat, resulting from natural causes or human activities, should be understood as potential hazards to mean a factor whose negative impact on the conservation status of the species is probable in the future, arising from natural causes or from human activity.

Applicable to Part I — VIII: Verify the information contained in the conservation task plan for conservation objectives and conservation activities for natural habitats/species — if the assessment of conservation status and identified risks is necessary. The objectives of conservation measures must be formulated to be measurable and verifiable, e.g. lowering the underline short circuit to 20%, reducing the number of invasive species X by half, etc. The objectives should be related to protective actions for their implementation, e.g. the objective: lowering the underline short circuit to 20% → protective action: cutting bushes on an area of 2.5 hectares.

Entire description of the order item in SWZ

Area of implementation of individual parts of the subject of the order

For Part VIII

Field work should be done on potential species sites. The Ordering Party shall make their location available in the vector layers annex 8 to the OPZ.

Applicable to Part I — IX: The assessment of the conservation status should be made in accordance with the Regulation of the Minister of the Environment of 17 February 2010 on the drawing up of a draft conservation task plan for Natura 2000 (Journal of Laws No. 34, item 186 as amended). The total assessment of the conservation status of natural habitat in the area should be derived from partial assessments made at research sites.

In addition, the Contracting Authority will make available the results of previous field tests, including conservation status assessments, for Parts I — VIII after signing an agreement with the Contractor.

Applicable to Part I — IX: For each research position, the contractor will provide field observation forms described in the methodical guides developed for the State Environmental Monitoring of the PMŚ.

In the absence of a finding of the occurrence of a natural habitat/species in the locations indicated, the Contractor shall be obliged to draw up simplified field observation forms containing at least the following information:

(a) the name and code of the natural habitat/species given in earlier studies;

(b) in the case of natural habitats: the name of the real vegetation unit (name of a plant assembly or plant community, together with association belonging to the compound, possibly the name of the compound itself);

(c) the date of field tests;

(d) the position coordinates in the PL-1992 system;

(e) in the observations of the form will explain whether, in the light of available knowledge, the research site has disappearance of the previously identified natural habitat/species together with the justification of why and a proposal for measures to restore it (where possible) or at the position research research has not previously found natural habitat/species and we are dealing with an error in identification.

Applies to Part I — IX: A component component of field observation forms is a list of current impacts; the contractor will supplement this list with potential impacts. When identifying the impacts, it is necessary to take into account primarily those of the nature of threats, divided into internal and external. A factor currently adversely affecting the conservation status of natural habitat, resulting from natural causes or human activities, should be understood as potential hazards to mean a factor whose negative impact on the conservation status of the species is probable in the future, arising from natural causes or from human activity.

Applicable to Part I — VIII: Verify the information contained in the conservation task plan for conservation objectives and conservation activities for natural habitats/species — if the assessment of conservation status and identified risks is necessary. The objectives of conservation measures must be formulated to be measurable and verifiable, e.g. lowering the underline short circuit to 20%, reducing the number of invasive species X by half, etc. The objectives should be related to protective actions for their implementation, e.g. the objective: lowering the underline short circuit to 20% → protective action: cutting bushes on an area of 2.5 hectares.

Entire description of the order item in SWZ

Area of implementation of individual parts of the subject of the order

For Part IX

Recognize the occurrence of narrowed pupa in Natura 2000 area outside sites administered by PGL LP, including estimation of species numbers in Natura 2000 area and recognizing the occurrence of existing and potential habitats in Natura 2000 area. to carry out field tests on a representative number of monitoring posts. Representativeness should be understood as the number of positions suitable for the total number and size of positions and the availability of species habitat in Natura 2000 area. The placement of posts must be dispersed throughout the area of species occurrence in the area.

The spatial range of Natura 2000 area excluding PGL LP sites is set out in Annex 9 to the OPZ.

Applicable to Part I — IX: The assessment of the conservation status should be made in accordance with the Regulation of the Minister of the Environment of 17 February 2010 on the drawing up of a draft conservation task plan for Natura 2000 (Journal of Laws No. 34, item 186 as amended). The total assessment of the conservation status of natural habitat in the area should be derived from partial assessments made at research sites.

In addition, the Contracting Authority will make available the results of previous field tests, including conservation status assessments, for Parts I — VIII after signing an agreement with the Contractor.

Applicable to Part I — IX: For each research position, the contractor will provide field observation forms described in the methodical guides developed for the State Environmental Monitoring of the PMŚ.

In the absence of a finding of the occurrence of a natural habitat/species in the locations indicated, the Contractor shall be obliged to draw up simplified field observation forms containing at least the following information:

(a) the name and code of the natural habitat/species given in earlier studies;

(b) in the case of natural habitats: the name of the real vegetation unit (name of a plant assembly or plant community, together with association belonging to the compound, possibly the name of the compound itself);

(c) the date of field tests;

(d) the position coordinates in the PL-1992 system;

(e) in the observations of the form will explain whether, in the light of available knowledge, the research site has disappearance of the previously identified natural habitat/species together with the justification of why and a proposal for measures to restore it (where possible) or at the position research research has not previously found natural habitat/species and we are dealing with an error in identification.

Applies to Part I — IX: A component component of field observation forms is a list of current impacts; the contractor will supplement this list with potential impacts. When identifying the impacts, it is necessary to take into account primarily those of the nature of threats, divided into internal and external. A factor currently adversely affecting the conservation status of natural habitat, resulting from natural causes or human activities, should be understood as potential hazards to mean a factor whose negative impact on the conservation status of the species is probable in the future, arising from natural causes or from human activity.

Entire description of the order item in SWZ