The subject of the order is:
Delivery of equipment and software under the National Recovery Plan:
Task 1 – Modification of the PACS system and implementation of a comprehensive solution for managing the description of radiological examinations integrated with the Intelligent Services Platform (PUI) of the e-Health Center
Task 2 – Delivery and implementation of the central patient monitoring system
Task 3 – Delivery of mobile workstations to the HIS system
Task 4 – Extension of EDM with new documents and monitoring and reporting of document indexing
Task 5 – Integration with the e-Health Center - treatment card - Digitization + indexing
Task 6 – Expansion of AMMS AI imaging documentation - interface to the CeZ system - Intelligent Services Platform
Task 7 – Implementation of AMMS software - Electronic stroke survey and Electronic endoprosthesis survey
Task 8 – Expansion of the wifi network
The contracting authority allows for the submission of partial offers.
The parts of the order are the individual tasks specified above, i.e., tasks from 1 to 8.
The contracting authority informs that the contractor may submit an offer for a maximum of 8 tasks (without limiting the number of tasks for one contractor).
The detailed description of the subject of the order is included in Annexes: 2b, 4, 3a-3h, 5 to the SWZ.
This proceeding is carried out under the Co-financing from the National Recovery and Resilience Plan, component D "Efficiency, accessibility, and quality of the health protection system."

LOT-0001
DZ.3321.186.2025 task 1
Task 1 – Modification of the PACS system and implementation of a comprehensive solution for managing the description of radiological examinations integrated with the Services Platform.
3.3. Requirements of the contracting authority regarding the subject of the order:
1) the offered product must have certificates, certifications and be registered in accordance with legal provisions requiring the possession of certifications, certificates and registrations,
2) the offered product must comply with the standards or technical specifications applicable to this product;
3.4. In cases where the description of the subject of the order specifies trademarks, patents, or origin, source, or specific process that characterizes certain products or services supplied by a particular contractor, it means that the contracting authority cannot describe the subject of the order in a sufficiently precise and understandable manner, however, in each such case the contracting authority accepts an equivalent solution described in the above manner. In such situations, any references to trademarks, patents, origin, source, or specific processes characterizing certain products or services provided by a particular contractor should be read together with the words "or equivalent."
Describing the subject of the order by reference to standards, technical evaluations, technical specifications, and technical reference systems mentioned in Article 101 paragraph 1 point 2 and paragraph 3, the contracting authority allows for solutions equivalent to those described. In such situations, any references should be read together with the words "or equivalent."
3.5. The contracting authority requires the performance of the subject of the order under the terms specified in the contract. The proposed provisions of the public procurement contract, which will be introduced into the contract, constitute annexes to the SWZ.
INFORMATION ON PLANNED ORDERS, MENTIONED IN ARTICLE 214 SECTION 1 POINTS 7 AND 8, IF THE CONTRACTING AUTHORITY PLANS TO AWARD SUCH ORDERS: The contracting authority does not anticipate awarding orders referred to in Article 214 paragraph 1 point 7 of the Pzp Act.
The contracting authority does not anticipate awarding orders referred to in Article 214 paragraph 1 point 8 of the Pzp Act.
13. DESCRIPTION OF THE CRITERIA THE CONTRACTING AUTHORITY WILL FOLLOW WHEN SELECTING THE OFFER, INCLUDING INDICATING THE WEIGHT OF THOSE CRITERIA AND THE METHOD OF EVALUATING OFFERS
13.1. The evaluation of offers will be carried out based on the criteria specified in the SWZ and their weights. Offers will be assessed pointwise separately concerning individual Tasks.
During the evaluation of offers, the sequentially reviewed and evaluated offers are assigned points for the following criteria according to the following rules:
Regarding all tasks:
PRICE CRITERION weight: 60%
Regarding the tasks: 1,4,5,6,7,8
DEADLINE FOR THE EXECUTION OF THE ORDER CRITERION weight: 40%
Regarding task 3
DEADLINE FOR THE EXECUTION OF THE ORDER CRITERION weight: 40%
Regarding task 2
QUALITY CRITERION weight: 40% (Bn)

LOT-0002
DZ.3321.186.2025 task 2
Task 2 – Delivery and implementation of the central patient monitoring system.
3.3. Requirements of the contracting authority regarding the subject of the order:
1) the offered product must have certificates, certifications and be registered in accordance with legal provisions requiring the possession of certifications, certificates and registrations,
2) the offered product must comply with the standards or technical specifications applicable to this product;
3.4. In cases where the description of the subject of the order specifies trademarks, patents, or origin, source, or specific process that characterizes certain products or services supplied by a particular contractor, it means that the contracting authority cannot describe the subject of the order in a sufficiently precise and understandable manner, however, in each such case the contracting authority accepts an equivalent solution described in the above manner. In such situations, any references to trademarks, patents, origin, source, or specific processes characterizing certain products or services provided by a particular contractor should be read together with the words "or equivalent."
Describing the subject of the order by reference to standards, technical evaluations, technical specifications, and technical reference systems mentioned in Article 101 paragraph 1 point 2 and paragraph 3, the contracting authority allows for solutions equivalent to those described. In such situations, any references should be read together with the words "or equivalent."
3.5. The contracting authority requires the performance of the subject of the order under the terms specified in the contract. The proposed provisions of the public procurement contract, which will be introduced into the contract, constitute annexes to the SWZ.
INFORMATION ON PLANNED ORDERS, MENTIONED IN ARTICLE 214 SECTION 1 POINTS 7 AND 8, IF THE CONTRACTING AUTHORITY PLANS TO AWARD SUCH ORDERS: The contracting authority does not anticipate awarding orders referred to in Article 214 paragraph 1 point 7 of the Pzp Act.
The contracting authority does not anticipate awarding orders referred to in Article 214 paragraph 1 point 8 of the Pzp Act.
13. DESCRIPTION OF THE CRITERIA THE CONTRACTING AUTHORITY WILL FOLLOW WHEN SELECTING THE OFFER, INCLUDING INDICATING THE WEIGHT OF THOSE CRITERIA AND THE METHOD OF EVALUATING OFFERS
13.1. The evaluation of offers will be carried out based on the criteria specified in the SWZ and their weights. Offers will be assessed pointwise separately concerning individual Tasks.
During the evaluation of offers, the sequentially reviewed and evaluated offers are assigned points for the following criteria according to the following rules:
Regarding all tasks:
PRICE CRITERION weight: 60%
Regarding the tasks: 1,4,5,6,7,8
DEADLINE FOR THE EXECUTION OF THE ORDER CRITERION weight: 40%
Regarding task 3
DEADLINE FOR THE EXECUTION OF THE ORDER CRITERION weight: 40%
Regarding task 2
QUALITY CRITERION weight: 40% (Bn)

LOT-0003
DZ.3321.186.2025 task 3
Task 3 – Delivery of mobile workstations to the HIS system.
3.3. Requirements of the contracting authority regarding the subject of the order:
1) the offered product must have certificates, certifications and be registered in accordance with legal provisions requiring the possession of certifications, certificates and registrations,
2) the offered product must comply with the standards or technical specifications applicable to this product;
3.4. In cases where the description of the subject of the order specifies trademarks, patents, or origin, source, or specific process that characterizes certain products or services supplied by a particular contractor, it means that the contracting authority cannot describe the subject of the order in a sufficiently precise and understandable manner, however, in each such case the contracting authority accepts an equivalent solution described in the above manner. In such situations, any references to trademarks, patents, origin, source, or specific processes characterizing certain products or services provided by a particular contractor should be read together with the words "or equivalent."
Describing the subject of the order by reference to standards, technical evaluations, technical specifications, and technical reference systems mentioned in Article 101 paragraph 1 point 2 and paragraph 3, the contracting authority allows for solutions equivalent to those described. In such situations, any references should be read together with the words "or equivalent."
3.5. The contracting authority requires the performance of the subject of the order under the terms specified in the contract. The proposed provisions of the public procurement contract, which will be introduced into the contract, constitute annexes to the SWZ.
INFORMATION ON PLANNED ORDERS, MENTIONED IN ARTICLE 214 SECTION 1 POINTS 7 AND 8, IF THE CONTRACTING AUTHORITY PLANS TO AWARD SUCH ORDERS: The contracting authority does not anticipate awarding orders referred to in Article 214 paragraph 1 point 7 of the Pzp Act.
The contracting authority does not anticipate awarding orders referred to in Article 214 paragraph 1 point 8 of the Pzp Act.
13. DESCRIPTION OF THE CRITERIA THE CONTRACTING AUTHORITY WILL FOLLOW WHEN SELECTING THE OFFER, INCLUDING INDICATING THE WEIGHT OF THOSE CRITERIA AND THE METHOD OF EVALUATING OFFERS
13.1. The evaluation of offers will be carried out based on the criteria specified in the SWZ and their weights. Offers will be assessed pointwise separately concerning individual Tasks.
During the evaluation of offers, the sequentially reviewed and evaluated offers are assigned points for the following criteria according to the following rules:
Regarding all tasks:
PRICE CRITERION weight: 60%
Regarding the tasks: 1,4,5,6,7,8
DEADLINE FOR THE EXECUTION OF THE ORDER CRITERION weight: 40%
Regarding task 3
DEADLINE FOR THE EXECUTION OF THE ORDER CRITERION weight: 40%
Regarding task 2
QUALITY CRITERION weight: 40% (Bn)

LOT-0004
DZ.3321.186.2025 task 4
Task 4 – Extension of EDM with new documents and monitoring and reporting of document indexing.
3.3. Requirements of the contracting authority regarding the subject of the order:
1) the offered product must have certificates, certifications and be registered in accordance with legal provisions requiring the possession of certifications, certificates and registrations,
2) the offered product must comply with the standards or technical specifications applicable to this product;
3.4. In cases where the description of the subject of the order specifies trademarks, patents, or origin, source, or specific process that characterizes certain products or services supplied by a particular contractor, it means that the contracting authority cannot describe the subject of the order in a sufficiently precise and understandable manner, however, in each such case the contracting authority accepts an equivalent solution described in the above manner. In such situations, any references to trademarks, patents, origin, source, or specific processes characterizing certain products or services provided by a particular contractor should be read together with the words "or equivalent."
Describing the subject of the order by reference to standards, technical evaluations, technical specifications, and technical reference systems mentioned in Article 101 paragraph 1 point 2 and paragraph 3, the contracting authority allows for solutions equivalent to those described. In such situations, any references should be read together with the words "or equivalent."
3.5. The contracting authority requires the performance of the subject of the order under the terms specified in the contract. The proposed provisions of the public procurement contract, which will be introduced into the contract, constitute annexes to the SWZ.
INFORMATION ON PLANNED ORDERS, MENTIONED IN ARTICLE 214 SECTION 1 POINTS 7 AND 8, IF THE CONTRACTING AUTHORITY PLANS TO AWARD SUCH ORDERS: The contracting authority does not anticipate awarding orders referred to in Article 214 paragraph 1 point 7 of the Pzp Act.
The contracting authority does not anticipate awarding orders referred to in Article 214 paragraph 1 point 8 of the Pzp Act.
13. DESCRIPTION OF THE CRITERIA THE CONTRACTING AUTHORITY WILL FOLLOW WHEN SELECTING THE OFFER, INCLUDING INDICATING THE WEIGHT OF THOSE CRITERIA AND THE METHOD OF EVALUATING OFFERS
13.1. The evaluation of offers will be carried out based on the criteria specified in the SWZ and their weights. Offers will be assessed pointwise separately concerning individual Tasks.
During the evaluation of offers, the sequentially reviewed and evaluated offers are assigned points for the following criteria according to the following rules:
Regarding all tasks:
PRICE CRITERION weight: 60%
Regarding the tasks: 1,4,5,6,7,8
DEADLINE FOR THE EXECUTION OF THE ORDER CRITERION weight: 40%
Regarding task 3
DEADLINE FOR THE EXECUTION OF THE ORDER CRITERION weight: 40%
Regarding task 2
QUALITY CRITERION weight: 40% (Bn)

LOT-0005
DZ.3321.186.2025 task 5
Task 5 – Integration with the e-Health Center - treatment card - Digitization + indexing.
3.3. Requirements of the Ordering Party regarding the subject of the order:
1) the offered product must have certificates, certifications, and be registered in accordance with the legal provisions requiring the possession of certificates, certifications, and registration,
2) the offered product must comply with the standards or technical specifications applicable to this product;
3.4. In cases where trademarks, patents, or origin, source or specific processes characterizing specific products or services provided by a particular contractor are indicated in the description of the subject of the order, it means that the Ordering Party cannot describe the subject of the order in a sufficiently precise and understandable manner; however, in each such situation, the Ordering Party allows for solutions equivalent to those described above. In such cases, any references to trademarks, patents, origin, source or specific processes characterizing specific products or services provided by a particular contractor should be interpreted together with the words “or equivalent”.
Describing the subject of the order by reference to standards, technical evaluations, technical specifications and technical reference systems referred to in Article 101(1)(2) and (3), the Ordering Party allows for solutions equivalent to those described. In such situations, any references should be interpreted together with the words “or equivalent”.
3.5. The Ordering Party requires the execution of the subject of the order on the terms specified in the contract. The proposed provisions of the contract for the public procurement, which will be introduced into the contract, constitute annexes to the SWZ.
INFORMATION ON ANTICIPATED ORDERS REFERRED TO IN ART. 214(1)(7) AND (8), IF THE ORDERING PARTY ANTICIPATES THE AWARD OF SUCH ORDERS The Ordering Party does not anticipate awarding orders referred to in Article 214(1)(7) of the Public Procurement Law.
The Ordering Party does not anticipate awarding orders referred to in Article 214(1)(8) of the Public Procurement Law.
13. DESCRIPTION OF THE CRITERIA BY WHICH THE ORDERING PARTY WILL BE GUIDED IN SELECTING THE OFFER, INCLUDING THE WEIGHTS OF THESE CRITERIA AND THE METHOD OF EVALUATING OFFERS
13.1. The evaluation of offers will be carried out based on the criteria specified in the SWZ and their weights.
Offers will be evaluated pointwise separately concerning each Task.
During the evaluation of offers, points will be awarded for the following criteria according to the following principles:
Regarding all tasks:
PRICE CRITERION weight: 60%
Regarding tasks: 1,4,5,6,7,8
DEADLINE FOR EXECUTION OF THE ORDER weight: 40%
Regarding task 3
DEADLINE FOR EXECUTION OF THE ORDER weight: 40%
Regarding task 2
QUALITY CRITERION weight: 40% (Bn)

LOT-0006
DZ.3321.186.2025 task 6
Task 6 - Expansion of AMMS AI documentation interface to the CeZ System - Intelligent Services Platform.
3.3. The Ordering Party's requirements regarding the subject of the order:
1) the offered product must have certificates, certifications, and be registered in accordance with the legal provisions requiring the possession of certificates, certifications, and registration,
2) the offered product must comply with the standards or technical specifications applicable to this product;
3.4. In cases where trademarks, patents, or origin, source or specific processes characterizing specific products or services provided by a particular contractor are indicated in the description of the subject of the order, it means that the Ordering Party cannot describe the subject of the order in a sufficiently precise and understandable manner; however, in each such situation, the Ordering Party allows for solutions equivalent to those described above. In such cases, any references to trademarks, patents, origin, source or specific processes characterizing specific products or services provided by a particular contractor should be interpreted together with the words “or equivalent”.
... (additional repeated content truncated for brevity) ...
3.3. The Ordering Party's requirements regarding the subject of the order:
1) the offered product must have certificates, certifications, and be registered in accordance with the legal provisions requiring the possession of certificates, certifications, and registration,
2) the offered product must comply with the standards or technical specifications applicable to this product;
3.4. In cases where trademarks, patents, or origin, source or specific processes characterizing specific products or services provided by a particular contractor are indicated in the description of the subject of the order, it means that the Ordering Party cannot describe the subject of the order in a sufficiently precise and understandable manner; however, in each such situation, the Ordering Party allows for solutions equivalent to those described above. In such cases, any references to trademarks, patents, origin, source or specific processes characterizing specific products or services provided by a particular contractor should be interpreted together with the words “or equivalent”.
...